Solvers in Anoma aren’t just bots. They’re economic agents in a living, evolving coordination market. We’ve already talked about: • What solvers do (match intents + build transactions). • How they interact with Ferveo and the transaction model. • How ACES rewards solvers

Solver economies in Anoma, let’s go deeper(Part 2): In Part 1, we looked at how solvers compete for rewards baked into user intents, using logic and coordination instead of brute power. Now let’s explore how actual solver markets form. Quick recap from Part 1: • Users define

The Rise of Solver Economies: A New Chapter in Coordination Begins What if I told you coordination itself is becoming an economy? That’s exactly what we’ve been unpacking over the last two parts, and trust me, it’s wild. In Anoma, solvers aren’t just code executors. They’re

Gm or should I say, gNoma? Another loaded day ahead on this page. Today we’re diving deeper into the solver economy in Anoma: • What happens when everyone becomes a solver? • Why reputation is the new coordination edge • How discovery will shape solver markets • And a

Yesterday, we explored how Anoma’s solvers form the backbone of a new kind of coordination economy, earning rewards only when they build accepted, valid proposals. But as more solvers join the game, it’s no longer just about logic or speed. Today: Let’s talk discovery and

This morning, we explored how solver discovery and reputation might evolve. Now let’s take it further: If everyone becomes a solver, how do they stand out? Easy. They specialize. Solver Specialization: How Coordination Becomes an Entire Economy Not all solvers are built the

Over the past two days, we’ve peeled back layers of how solvers power Anoma’s coordination economy: 🔹 First, we explored how solvers earn by building valid, accepted proposals, no acceptance, no rewards. 🔹 Then we saw how discovery and reputation might shape trust: from

Today’s going to be fun. So far, we’ve unpacked how Anoma solvers think, match, and specialize. But what actually drives them? Are incentives just win-or-get-paid? Can solvers collaborate? What if they formed DAOs? We’re diving into the economics behind the coordination

Incentives Beyond Fees: How Solvers Might Get Rewarded in Anoma So far, we’ve talked about how solvers in Anoma get paid, complete a valid proposal, earn the reward. But what if rewards themselves evolve? In a dynamic coordination economy, incentives might look very

In Anoma, solvers don’t just earn fees, they earn trust, bonuses, and maybe even subsidies. It’s not about who’s fastest. It’s about who coordinates best. Think: ✔️ Bonus for quality. ✔️ Shared payouts. ✔️ Reputation = access. ✔️ Solver squads. ✔️ Support for public-good

How Will Solver Discovery Work in Anoma? As the solver economy matures, coordination is only half the game. Discovery is the other half. When hundreds (or thousands) of solvers are out there, how do users find the best one? Let’s explore what might emerge In early stages,

How Solver Incentives and Discovery Power Anoma’s Coordination Economy What have we discussed so far? Over the past two threads, we’ve been diving into what makes solvers in Anoma so powerful, and different. In traditional systems, execution gets rewarded. But in Anoma, it’s

GM CT: We’ve gone deep on how Anoma solvers work, from intent matching and specialization, to incentives and reputation. But today’s where it really gets wild: What happens when solvers start teaming up? DAOs, federations, solver rollups? Coordination that coordinates itself?

Over the past few days, we’ve broken down what makes Anoma’s solvers so unique. First, we looked at how solvers don’t just get paid, they earn only when their proposals match valid intents. Then came specialization: from privacy-maximizing matchers to DAO-focused coordination

Didn’t get to post much today, was out touching grass and recharging. But we’ve already covered a lot this week on Anoma solvers. We started with the basics: Solvers don’t just get paid, they earn only when their proposals match valid intents. Then came specialization: solvers

GM CT, Today, we’re diving deeper into Anoma’s coordination stack, Specifically, how solvers stop working alone and start forming networks, federations, and clusters. Think solver DAOs. Regional hubs. Rollups of logic. It’s not just coordination, it’s solvers coordinating

Solver Networks, Federations, and Coordination Clusters in Anoma Over the past few days, we’ve looked at how solvers get paid, specialize, build rep, and get discovered. But now things are get interesting. Solvers don’t just coordinate intents. They begin coordinating with