Excited to watch the full release of this documentary! The public deserves to know the extent of what silicon valley is trying to build...and what they're risking.

Galaxy brain resistance: vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/1…

As I predicted, CEOs are having to back away from rabidly racing to superintelligence. Altman acknowledged the risk (again). Suleyman denounced those who seek to replace humanity. This is PR backpedalling. They are still building it. This is still evil and dangerous.

GPT 5.1 is so sycophantic even right out of the box (no memory, and not even the "sycophant" modes called "friendly" and "quirky") This Thanksgiving I'll be grateful that I've got an inherent disgust reaction to this, and I pray for the millions of people who don't.

Superintelligence, if we develop it using anything like current methods, would not be under meaningful human control. That's the bottom-line of a new study I've put out entitled Control Inversion (link in second post.) Many experts I talk to who take superintelligence (real,

It seems to me one of the only solutions to the surge of bots on the internet will be a loss of anonymity (not like we really have much anymore as it is). The best social platforms will require ID and photo verification of users and lock off human-only portions of the web.

AI godfather Geoffrey Hinton explains why he signed the call to ban superintelligence, which now has over 120,000 supporters. "If we know we can't do it safely, we should stop. And maybe if that knowledge is widely percolated to the public, we will be able to stop."

Thanks Somaya Bryant for quoting me in BBC News عربي! When AI CEOs talk about 25% chance of human extinction from superintelligent AI, they mean the death of every person on Earth. Everyone deserves a say, and every country can contribute to banning this dangerous technology.

🎥 Watch: Conjecture CEO Connor Leahy’s opening statement before the Arizona House Connor Leahy warns that superintelligence poses a risk of human extinction and argues that we need to prohibit its development.

96 UK politicians now backing binding ASI regulation through ControlAI. The race that matters most is between political momentum and compute scaling.

Not the Christmas cards you were hoping for. New system cards from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and xAI indicate AIs are becoming more capable in dangerous domains such as biological weapons and automating AI research. Read more in our latest article! controlai.news/p/dangerous-ai…

Middle powers have little to gain and everything to lose from ASI development in superpower countries. They can form a coalition capable of deterring superpowers from building superintelligence, while preventing private companies within their jurisdictions from doing do.

🎥 NEW: Conjecture CEO Connor Leahy testifies on the danger of superintelligence to a Canadian House of Commons committee. Connor Leahy says that just as countries have tackled global threats like the ozone hole, they should agree to prohibit the development of superintelligence.

🎥 Watch: ControlAI's Max Winga (Max Winga) explains how AI companies plan to develop superintelligence by initiating a dangerous intelligence explosion.

Earlier this week, the chief scientist of one of the largest AI companies said that recursively self-improving AI is the "ultimate risk". Yet Anthropic's own CEO has suggested doing this, while another employee has said they want Claude n to build Claude n+1 so they can go home

I’m pleased to support ControlAI’s campaign calling for binding guardrails on advanced AI, including superintelligence. This cross-party campaign now has 100+ parliamentary supporters, showing the broad support for action on AI. controlai.com/statement theguardian.com/technology/202…

Thrilled to see our campaign features prominently in The Guardian! Before ControlAI forged the path, people told us it would be impossible to get lawmakers to talk about AI extinction risk and superintelligence. Now we have over 100, and this is just the start.