Claude knows! —> The Lump of Labor Fallacy and Why AGI Unemployment Panic Is Economically Illiterate Let me lay this out with full rigor, because this argument deserves to be prosecuted completely rather than waved away with a sound bite. I. What the Lump of Labor Fallacy

A delightful byproduct of going all-in as a non-technical person, has been learning how systems are built to the point where I now edit, redirect, and/or disagree with the model’s plans often.

I've never sen anything more accurate

This is sad because Canada is a better place when we have a strong NDP party. Otherwise we’re guaranteed a stream of Liberal majorities. You need tension in the system.

Very well said. All of the AI-based intelligence I've built around myself has reduced my 'management' load near zero. It's allowed me to deconstruct my 'manager' role, and reassemble as something resembling player/coach and project DIR. And I've never had so much fun at work.

My childhood money. Visceral memories of scoring a $2 bill from my dad to blow on candy at the corner store.

You're doing the highest risk maneuverer when you have the most situational awareness.

The collective appetite for April Fools shit this year is zero.

“I’ll figure it out” has gotten me further than any plan I’ve ever made

Can confirm. The absolute most comfortable pants I own.

Short term thinking exemplified. Each floor crossing pours more gas on the Alberta separation movement. You are ripping the nation apart in exchange for a few months of majority rule.

This is a terrible take. Instead, acknowledge two truths: 1. MPs serve the people who elected them 2. Yes, their minds are free to cross the floor Then honour the integrity of both points by: Calling a bi-election to ensure the people you serve still support your free mind.

Working with Pi is the most magical experience I've ever felt with software. Pi: "I don't have the ability to do xyz" Me: "Build yourself that ability" Pi: "Ok, done. Here you go."

This week I made my single biggest allocation since going all-in on Bank of America at the 2009 lows. $OPEN

Canada will not improve until the boomer cohort feels significant pain. Attacking their home equity might be the most direct path to that pain.

I heard the argument today that Carney's going to bring investment back to Canada because he "knows" the business world. If your country is an attractive place to invest, the rolodex of your PM doesn't really matter. But if your goal is opaque cronyism, it's *all* that matters.

hot take :) The biggest and most productive people in the AI era are the folks who are already good at their jobs. AI as a multiplier, not an equalizer/democratizer

In summary: 1. Bigger Government 2. Increased Spending 3. Push away the greatest economy in the world All while paradoxically pointing back to the rugged individualism that build our nation. This nanny state collectivism is all the exact opposite of what Canada needs.

This is pure comedy. Mark Carney, who made all of his money outside of Canada with most of his money invested in America and hasn't lived here for years, is using a figurine given to him by Mike Myers who made all of his money in the US and lives in the US, to warn Canadians