A very anti-science individual who's never conducted an experiment but regularly claims to have a PhD is in charge of allocating medical R&D for 330 million people What could go possibly wrong?

However the case would seem to be largely the opposite when it comes to the American empire 🧐

Cited examples of so-called left bias on Wikipedia are mostly bogus. E.g. mentions of left-wing vs right-wing violence basically just track the actual incidence rates, meaning the ground truth

If only we all had the firm principles and clarity of vision exemplified by a $25 million super PAC & personal relationship with Donald Trump 🧐

When the best thing the AI can think to say about your district is that it is "not **consistently** ranked as the quote absolute murder capital", you know something is up

If you eliminate the academic pool competing to disseminate, you can bet that the private labs will swiftly stop competing to disseminate. Make it all open access for sure and less gatekeeping, but sequence attention doesn't exist without LSTMs, which don't exist without RNNs,

Headed to shelves near you

The look on NK's face subtky screams "I am so about to get a dragon" 🤺

Truly an honor

Jim Chanos isn’t buying crypto hype: Meme coins are “just another manifestation” of what he calls a “casino society.” Full convo w/ Lynn Parramore. James Chanos #fintwit ineteconomics.org/perspectives/b…

I think therefore I can think a short haiku to sell. Pure labor ⊥

Least Newspeak-y thing about the administration that is actively as they say "weaponizing the federal government"

Someone at the cafe right now is talking to their AI girlfriend. I thought this was something people only did for news crews???

BLS survey response have slipped to truly dismal levels since 2020. And it seems the nonresponse bias is about in the direction you would expect: businesses not hiring aren't eager to broadcast that fact Survey methodology is very significant

I'm horrified to hear that Charlie Kirk was shot at an event in Utah. Democratic societies will always have political disagreements, but we must never allow America to become a country that confronts those disagreements with violence. Mark and I are praying for Charlie's

"Societies tend to make progress in their non-material character when most of the people have a sense of moving forward in their material living standard" Reminiscent of FDR's comments on the four intertwined freedoms. Democracy must deliver on its promises! We are in

Political violence is unacceptable, no matter what person does it and what person it's done to It is also unacceptable to use a crime against free speech as a rationale for clamping down on free speech, as DJT implies he intends to do here