Mrs.MaggiCBdJ (Taylor`s Version) (@maggicbdj) 's Twitter Profile
Mrs.MaggiCBdJ (Taylor`s Version)

@maggicbdj

Mother, wife, daughter, sister, teacher, friend, reading and music fan AND Taylor Swift fan (NOT necessarily in that order😉) since 2009

ID: 1021942366821904384

calendar_today25-07-2018 02:17:01

4,4K Tweet

96 Followers

63 Following

✨️Paige✨️ (@bejeweledpaige) 's Twitter Profile Photo

People are taking the paternity test comment and really running with the "but she's always made it obvious who songs are about" side of things when the actual point was her making it clear that her writing shouldn't be attributed to the "muse" because she wrote it, not them

whitney 🤍 (@whitaysversion) 's Twitter Profile Photo

you guys say what you want. I know what she did. I love them. go with god, sorry. you can come around if you want it’s okay if you don’t

you guys say what you want. I know what she did. I love them. go with god, sorry. you can come around if you want it’s okay if you don’t
H (@actuallyloveit) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Drake, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar, Ariana Grande, Post Malone, The Weeknd, Adele, BTS, Bieber... just a few of the artists who benefit from Taylor making the unprecedented move in 2018 to require UMG to make her & their other artists shareholders. It's one of the reasons why

Pop Base (@popbase) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Taylor Swift’s record contract could lead to millions of dollars being paid to artists as UMG prepares to sell half of their equity stake in Spotify. When Swift signed her contract in 2018, she negotiated a clause stating that any sale of UMG’s Spotify shares would result in a

Taylor Swift’s record contract could lead to millions of dollars being paid to artists as UMG prepares to sell half of their equity stake in Spotify.

When Swift signed her contract in 2018, she negotiated a clause stating that any sale of UMG’s Spotify shares would result in a
Joe McBob (@mrjoemcbob) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What's important about this is this clause in her deal doesn't actually benefit Taylor personally. UMG was already paying out artists for sales of their Spotify shares, but only artists who had already "recouped" their costs. That's Taylor and other big artists. So she would've

Anish Moonka (@anisha_moonka) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Universal Music is selling $1.4 billion in Spotify shares. It paid nothing for them. Spotify handed the shares over in 2008 just for letting Spotify play music, and the deal was set up so almost none of that money would ever reach the artists who made the music. Taylor Swift's

veronica⸆⸉ | fan acc. (@thisisvertrying) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I’m so tired of some of you misinterpreting what Taylor said so here’s the full clip with my explanation, it turned out long but please stay here. “I have to know that like there's certain things that we have as a tradition between me and my fans … but at the same time there's

ker ⚡️ (@kerrrr22) 's Twitter Profile Photo

History has been on her side 100% of the time. People just can’t seem to be normal about this woman and appreciate what she’s done for artists.

crazyaussie85 (@newmangirl85) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The fandom is so big now there’s no way she can keep everyone happy every release. So Taylor please do what makes you happy I will always support you. Coming from a mum that can’t find a dinner all 5 of my kids like and won’t complain about 😂

aniyah🤎🫶🏾 (@i_hateithereee) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It’s funny that in all my time stanning Taylor, she has never done anything that made me side eye her, but people make up the most cruel things about her just for fun.

͛ (@goodgirlfaiith) 's Twitter Profile Photo

why would an artist that has advocated for “give credit where credit is due” their entire career deny credit where it’s due?