Renovating democracy while protecting the critical pathways/nuances of our input. How can we steer it to both renovate and reserve? The voiced/unvoiced views should be recognized,not sacrificed in the accelerated process of summarization in the name of popularized broad listening

Would "broad listening" keep the sufficient bits of information? One of the examples of summarization efforts might have shown a potentially critical information loss in its lossy compression. It comes from a summary of PR#513 in one of the social experiments.

Another application of a "broad listening" tool. Will the execution ensure accountability by providing auditable reporting & decisions although the city has clearly set the question & expectations that it takes opinions only as references? How could our voices be made to be heard

A Rise of Democratic Agency in different forms by NotebookLM. 1. 6-minute video 2. 20-minute audio overview 3. 15-minute audio overview in Japanese 1 of 3, the 6-minute video (the color theme reminds of the one used by DemocracyNext)

Where can I look to learn more about what the team DeepGov offered? The Kusensel article is 59 days old requiring Full Access... I hope to see how all the components interplay and reserve nuances/context in sensemaking/broadlistening. Watched Zuizerland video,looked at gg23 repo.