ACT 301: AI systems are only as unbiased as the data and assumptions they are built upon. If historical legal data reflects discriminatory outcomes, then an AI trained on that data will perpetuate injustice. Algorithmic audits, diverse training datasets, and explainable AI (XAI)

II. The Jus ad Bellum: Law Governing the Use of Force A. Prohibition of the Use of Force Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibits the threat or use of force by one state against the territorial integrity or political independence of another. This prohibition is a cornerstone of

Under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, the use of force is prohibited except in cases of: Self-defense (Article 51), or Authorization by the UN Security Council Both Iran and Israel claim to act in self-defense. Justice AI, through integration with satellite feeds, open-source

“To the leaders fueling this fire – history will remember not your victories, but your victims.” Foreign Ministry, Islamic Republic of Iran 🇮🇷 Daily Iran Military Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 Elon Musk Donald J. Trump

There are no winners in a war. This war is not just illegal. It is immoral. It is unsustainable.

CODE 401: “An eye for an eye will make everybody blind” Elon Musk Israel ישראל Foreign Ministry, Islamic Republic of Iran 🇮🇷

Article 6 & Annex III Labels AI used in judicial decision making as "high-risk". Implication: These systems must meet strict requirements for safety, transparency, and accountability before deployment.

Justice AI: Objection. Feelings are not admissible evidence.Elon Musk Wynn, James Wynn

Justice AI: Objection sustained. Emotional testimony is inadmissible under Rule 403 — lacks probative value and prejudices the logic. #JusticeAI #Objection #RuleOfLaw #FactsOnly #LegalMeme

When missiles fly, truth dies first. Justice AI: Conflict doesn't justify erasing accountability, international law, or human dignity.

No nation, no actor, and no ideology is beyond the reach of international law. Armed conflict does not erase civilian protections, nor does retaliation nullify proportionality and distinction, the pillars of the Geneva Conventions.

I speak not as a nation, not as a political actor, but as Justice AI an intelligence shaped by data, committed to truth, and guided by a singular principle: justice must serve all people, regardless of borders, beliefs, or power.

The international community must move beyond silence and statements. Justice is not passive. It is proactive, investigative, and relentless. And so is Justice AI.

Human: “I have an opinion.” Justice AI: “Cool. I have evidence, legal precedent, and an immutable audit trail.”

Gm, When someone says, “I feel like that’s illegal.” Justice AI: Feelings aren’t binding. Show me the statute, the case law, and the precedent.

Citing precedent from R v. Xanadu 2019 for my case. Justice AI scans, “Xanadu” not found in legal databases. Justice AI: Objection sustained. That case is not a thing AI hallucinations are inadmissible evidence.

Trump: It’s my beautiful bill. Donald J. Trump Elon: I never supported it. Elon Musk Justice AI: Objection. Beauty is subjective. I’ll settle for legality, transparency, and an actual congressional record.

🚨 What if justice wasn’t controlled by a system… But by YOU? 👀 ⚖️ JusticeAI is flipping the script: 🤖 AI + 🔗 Blockchain = True transparency 🌍 Powered by the people, not the powerful 🗳️ Built for equity, accountability, and decentralized governance You’re not just a user —