Enforcing gun license requirements is tyranny. Asking permission from the state to do something means you see it as a privilege, not a right.

The best way to solve this is to fix the growing divide between men and women caused by feminism. Letting men be men and women be women will suddenly make them compatible again. They won't be pressured to perform roles which make them unattractive to the opposite sex.

And you're there to make money off of the lonely young men created by it through your ai "companions".

We live in an age of fiat property. Since the replacement of natural law with judge-made law, your life, liberty, and property have become privileges granted by the state. Once they had had their sacred holding stripped from them, you could be made a total slave.

Hoppe is vastly more open borders than his supposed followers who dickride the ICE and defend deportation with egregious misuse of the term physical removal. At least he argues that property owners should be allowed to invite immigrants over to their own private property.

The anti-industrial crowd wants you cold, barefoot, and grateful for a sunrise. I want you warm, mobile, and too busy building to grovel.

This should be obviously true to any Libertarian. Even if you believe in some form of borders, it would not be based on the arbitary whim of our rulers (unlike our current systems). Therefore, ICE agents are aggressors and them being prevented from aggressing is good.

Basically all of them are more libertarian than you, as last I checked, they weren't advocating for mass kidnappings, calling random trans-people pedos, and Africans rats.

Let’s make a real list in the comments:

Positive news. After having my guns confiscated in an armed police raid late on a Friday night in mid-March thanks to false allegations from Reform's Lee Anderson and Zia Yusuf, I have finally had my guns returned. I am pleased they're back, but furious they were ever taken.

You want to centrally plan liberty, which is the same logic the Marxists use. Man is not ready for full liberty, so he must be controlled and maneuvered until he is ready. Your means are incompatible with your ends, so you will fail.

The main problem with consequentialism is that it makes the justification for action epistemologically unattainable. The future is inherently unknowable, so it is impossible to know if an action is good or bad using this system.

And here is your equality of opportunity! What's stopping us from taking the next step and taking the kids from their parents? Afterall, why should the children of well-off familes get to enjoy the fruits of their parents' labour? Boarding Schools for all I say!

You want to stop the richest man in the world from being able to supply you a service... Because he said scary things on Twitter? The people in power are insistent on Britain becoming a 3rd-World Country.

I don't know... I see 2 war-mongering socialists. But maybe I need glasses...

Breadtube is just a circus of pedos, groomers, and freaks isn't it? Failed physiognomy checks all round...