Solun the dicotomy is a false one product of taking aristotelian logic too far. i like to think that an evidence of this can be found in the singularity that is the present moment: it's like an interplay between somethingness and nothingness, like an ever-changing stillness
Solun if you were to tackle this logically it would lead to contradictions, but i don't think any sensible human being would deny it being real. i think it's a good example of two "opposing processes" coexisting in ways we can't accurately conceptualize or logically corroborate
Ever noticed how Tate does this mudra quite often? It's called Yoni Mudra:
Yoni (योनि): The vulva; origin; water.
Biggest masculine role on the internet unknowingly channelling Shakti. Funny how the psyche unconsciously contorts the body to find ease
tbi... (thijnk about it)
Animals are also God because they exist, like humans.
Nature is just the ebb and flow of God (it just is). There is indeed "imperfection" in Nature or in anything that exists because it's not whole, it's just an aspect of God. Where there's life there's necessarily imperfection
What is the "shape" of that which can take any shape?
That "shape" would be Chaos. It is something impossible to visualize. It is a primordial, infinite potentiality. Defined as such, one of its potentials must be Order. It is in the edge between these things where Cosmos occurs
>Something doesn't bring itself from potency to act
I believe this to be an assuption. We have a direct analogue of the contrary when it comes to the origin of life on Earth. You have a primal potenciality that by its own natural dynamics "became something" out of itself
This Sunday morning, I want to direct your attention to a chapter titled 'Fungal Minds,' where we engage in a philosophical discussion about how fungi might perceive the world. The book is available everywhere link.springer.com/book/10.1007/9…