Even if OP_RETURN is disabled at consensus level, mempool filters implementation is still needed in Bitcoin node software.

Are there any proud donors to Bitcoin Core organization here? Reply, please.

Are you for or against the consensus change to remove OP_RETURN in Bitcoin?

Pledditor It's not storage only. It's distribution as well. Bitcoin™ Core v30 will distribute any crap by default. Be responsible, upgrade to Bitcoin Knots: github.com/bitcoinknots/b…

I am running Bitcoin Knots with the setting "datacarrier=0". Bitcoin Core is obsolete. Furthermore, it's vendor is anti-Bitcoin.

"The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be." - Satoshi Nakamoto

Satoshi who setup policy and prohibited OP_RETURN vs "very talented devs" in Bitcoin Core dismantling the policy feature.

Bitcoin™ Core officials demonstrate ultra-high time preference, sadly.

Bitcoin Core™ on brink of collapse

Let's fight spam. Run Bitcoin Knots.

Bitcoin P2P network is the best privacy tool for monetary transactions. It is damaged by spamming attacks which are facilitated by Bitcoin™ Core and co. Run Bitcoin Knots instead, set "datacarrier=0".

The more forceful immune response to spam, the stronger the Bitcoin.

Know your customer (KYC) vs know your enemy

Resisting spam, running Bitcoin Knots.

I don't know who needs to read this, except Bitcoin™ Core dictators and their fans: *********************************** *** node runners want to *** *** stop spam. *** ***********************************

Do you want to: