Do not attend the Tommy Robinson rally today. Empowering a known criminal always ends badly.

This cliché-ridden post reveals why remigration is likely to be hardline and complete. 1. Does comping someone’s meal make the gang rapes, drug dealing, dole fraud, and general degradation worth it? 2. If he can nominate his lovely exception to remigration then so can everyone.

This poisonous juncture between (i) orthodox multiculti virtue, and (ii) English class snobbery, is what led to the callous indifference in the face of the rape gangs. I don't think either has gone away.

Final update on Newbury and Solihull appeals for funding GiveSendGo say these donations have now been refunded. Please see my post from a couple of weeks ago, below. Thanks again for all these generous donations. My regrets if your money has been refunded even though you asked me

The ingratitude of Israelis toward the British is off the charts. Britain created Israel, out of idealism and our towering moral and physical authority. They would have been massacred, never gained critical mass, and Israel would have remained a gleam in Chaim Weitzmann's eye.

I'm at the 0:46 mark.

"We’ve got to get beyond this thing of being in hock to the bond markets" express.co.uk/finance/person… The prelude to money printing => collapse. This self-server may mean it, but he says it because MPs want to hear it because lots of us will vote for it instead of cuts. More

Andy Burnham can't get a seat in time, so this lady is being touted as Starmer's successor. Watch out.

The naivety around values-deportation. "Those who hate us must leave" Picture how will this filter gets applied and enforced, without laughing.

I now regret expressing only mild scepticism over the phrase "Sensible Nationalism" back when I hosted Kenny Smith and Gavin Boby in an X space earlier this year. Gavin and I began the space as pretty much complete sceptics when it came to democratic solutions. To his credit

This is why system collapse is unavoidable. Most of us, maybe 9 out of 10, drag more out than we put in. So tax and spend will keep ratcheting up until everything breaks. Once you understand this chart, you know everything you need to know about the democratic state:

When the jig's up, the villains start pointing fingers at each other.

Or he could have said: "Ooh, yes I'd like to increase workers' wages permanently, which will get me even more votes next time." ("And if that means temporary higher interest rates while the economy adjusts then that's a small price to pay") Instead he chose mass immigration. Just

The economic reason for immigration was refuted 20 years ago: it doesn't make us more prosperous. The economic reason today is pathetic: to prop up our dying, statist economy. GDP is shrinking (recession) which will immediately scare off lenders, who we need to prop up our

Managed de-growth might work in theory, but there's no possibility that we'll try it, because the welfare state rides the debt bubble, and we won't tolerate any reversal of the welfare ratchet. See Rachel Reeves. And lenders would flee if they saw year on year contraction, ie

The reason I don't think we can avoid collapse is because of our iron-clad expectations about the welfare state. Panic and anger about welfare collapse will bring the system down. Economic breakdown => welfare breakdown => social breakdown.

Following Fiona Goddard’s resignation this morning, I have also made the decision to resign with immediate effect. The final turning point for me was the push to widen the remit of the National Inquiry in ways that downplay the racial and religious motivations behind our abuse.