No matter how much they cut, the majority of people will always believe there is waste in government spending, even if the majority of people approve of every single thing the government spends money on. “Most people want to cut waste” is not a sound argument to cut spending.

The people who wailed against the tyranny of government for being asked to wear a mask are the same people who want to impeach a federal judge for deciding that the government can’t kidnap people off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without due process.

This is what the law says

The same people who cry out everyday for corrupt politicians to be sent to prison for stealing public funds are the same people who start crying when corrupt politicians are sent to prison for stealing public funds.

Article 1 Section 5 “Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings,…” It’s definitely not unconstitutional.

Obvious answer: with Voter ID already being law, and with the current opportunity to write it in their Constitution, Voter ID wasn’t an issue whatsoever when it came to which judge sat on the SC.

Booker’s actually accomplished its purpose, although you are clearly ignorant of what that was.

Wow Millionaire Republicans who talk shit for a living on TV, while living in the wealthiest country on Earth, crying about how the world is unfair. Makes me want to puke.

And tariffs are OFF, for now.

The White House says negotiations with China are/aren't happening, that they do/don't expect to cut/raise tariffs soon/in a bit/never, and they intend to play hardball/softball with China. Trump and Xi have/haven't spoken, and they do/don't expect a breakthrough sooner/later.

Any self-respecting news agency would have died from shame for posting this ludicrously absurd statistic. Somehow the DPRK worthy ass-kissing by the AG isn’t the most bizarre thing in this clip.

If someone asks the President of the United States if he needs to uphold the Constitution and the answer he gives is anything other than “yes,” we have a big, big problem.

These people in the comments simping for a billionaire telling them how many pencils their child can have is next-level Orwellian bullshit.

Why is it that when I have lots of ambient light, my iPhone screen dims? Like bitch that’s when I need you to be bright. Do you not understand how this shit works?

Even when it’s spelled out in plain English, they still can’t get it. This clearly says that birthright citizenship is for every class of person except foreigners who are the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers.

Lol. Using “his mother was born in Delaware” as evidence for his mother being a citizen, while declaring that Ted is not a birthright citizen because his mother was a citizen, is pretty ironic.

The way I see it, if birthright citizenship was struck down, the only people who could claim citizenship would be naturalized citizens or those who can trace their lineage to a naturalized citizen. All other citizenships would be invalid.

Embracing the “feelings don’t care about your facts” attitude is merely an attempt to justify behavior that you know to be reprehensible, but you want to be able to say is acceptable because it feels good. It’s the position held by those who are morally bankrupt.

Not globally, you don’t. Those daily increases are not global increases. They are daily fluctuations that occur locally and are offset by other local fluctuations. Sorry, for quote-tweeting and not replying because the OP blocked me for pointing out his error.

Yes, the people who actually record and use the temperature measurements know to what precision they are made. Sorry for having to quote-tweet for my reply. The OP blocked me for pointing out his errors.