David H. Jiang
@davidhjiang
@KnightHennessy ‘22 | @StanfordLaw ‘25 | @Yale ‘19 | Managing Editor, @StanLRev Vol. 77
ID: 395603888
http://davidhjiang.com 21-10-2011 23:00:45
171 Tweet
178 Followers
594 Following
High-Deductible Health Plans and Acute Complications Among Adults With Diabetes ja.ma/3ZSSDO8 via JAMA Network Open part of JAMA Network I wish I could say I was surprised... #diabetes
For me, this mentor was Rozalina (Grubina) McCoy, MD MS! She taught me how to write persuasively with accuracy and conviction. Priceless attributes for a law student!
During COVID, state legislatures got busy reforming public health emergency powers laws... ...and, mostly, made them worse. My analysis in The BMJ, w/PublicHealthLawRsrch colleagues: bmj.com/content/384/bm… Thank you Commonwealth Fund @GYamey @adiezroux Stanford Law School StanfordHealthPolicy
“Governmental powers proved too fragmented & limited, making it difficult to erect a nationwide net of community mitigation measures” Michelle Mello David H. Jiang Scott Burris & team evaluate the US #covid19 response & the lessons to be learnt bmj.com/content/384/bm…
In analysis of #COVID19 response, Michelle Mello, David H. Jiang & @scottburrisphl find governmental powers proved too fragmented and limited, making it difficult to erect a nationwide net of community mitigation measures. ⚕️ bit.ly/3HXlnxd The BMJ PublicHealthLawRsrch
US Court Rulings Constrain Public Health Powers During #COVID19. In this Health Affairs article, SHP's Michelle Mello & colleagues consider how the decisions in pandemic-associated lawsuits could limit public health legal powers going forward. Read: stanford.io/3KgdhkF
Courts handed plaintiffs challenging COVID-19 health a victory 112 times. My analysis of these wins w/Wendy Parmet & David H. Jiang Health Affairs: bit.ly/3QVBJeQ Explainer from StanfordHealthPolicy: bit.ly/3wLFEE4 Thank you Commonwealth Fund for supporting this work
In over 100 judicial decisions from March 2020 to March 2023, courts constrained public health legal powers. Michelle Mello David H. Jiang of Stanford Law School StanfordHealthPolicy +coauthor assess the meaning and implications for policy going forward. Read the article: bit.ly/4ejEHDX
In the first Article, Will Kamin argues that historical evidence suggests a reconceptualization of habeas corpus, with doctrinal and normative benefits. stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/…
Will Kamin In the second Article, LipsonLaw and David Skeel @ Penn use FTX as a case study to argue for bankruptcy reform. stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/…
Will Kamin LipsonLaw David Skeel @ Penn In the third Article, Emily Suski demonstrates and critiques the courts’ tendency to analyze Title IX and Section 1983 claims under the same standards. stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/…
Will Kamin LipsonLaw David Skeel @ Penn Emily Suski In a Note, Elliot Setzer (SLS ’25) contends that the original understanding of Article II did not limit law enforcement to the Executive branch. stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/…
Lina Khan Samuel Levine Stephanie T. Nguyen Brian Highsmith In the second Article, @aad_pad warns how some circuit judges have taken Garland v. Ming Dai to remove reasoned decision-making requirements for agency deportation decisions. stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/…