🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

Shortened NTJ abstract: In pub finance scholarship, lawyers have comparative advantages (as well as disadvantages) vs. economists. These can help lawyers to make unique contributions that are not limited to their deploying institutional knowledge about the law and legal practice.

Tax Law Review Publishes New Issue bit.ly/3WB901S NYU Law UChicago Law School Daniel Hemel Mirit Eyal The University of Alabama School of Law Daniel Shaviro

Reflections about an unusually structured memoir that I have just finished writing. danshaviro.blogspot.com/2025/03/quanda…

Research Handbook on Law and Time, edited by Frank Fagan and Saul Levmore Contributors incl Jeannie Suk Gersen Daniel Shaviro Daniel Hemel tomginsburg Yonathan Arbel Abdi Aidid Jonathan Masur More information ➡️ e-elgar.com/shop/isbn/9781… Read free chapter ➡️ doi.org/10.4337/978103…

Front and back covers of my soon to be published memoir (via Amazon KDP, and I anticipate for a very reasonable price as Kindle book & print-on-demand paperback).

Today I self-published my memoir, Now Is Now and Then Is Then, on Kindle Direct Publishing. Kindle price $4.99, but not available for perhaps another 72 hours. I'll add a print-on-demand paperback option next week; couldn't do so today due to formatting issues.

My memoir, "Now Is Now and Then Is Then," has gone live on Kindle for a mere $4.99. amazon.com/dp/B0FBMJSDWY/…

The paperback version of my memoir, Now Is Now and Then Is Then, is now available on Amazon for $7.99. Kindle version is $4.99 or free if you subscribe to Kindle Unlimited. amazon.com/Now-Then-Memoi…

My previous published book before the memoir. kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/d…

I gather that the GOP score of the Senate tax bill DOES show budgetary costs as being lowered by the expiration of new provisions (such as the higher standard deduction). This blatantly contradicts its use of a "current policy" baseline for 2017 provision. (1 of 2)

The Senate GOP's refusal to use a current-policy baseline for NEW provisions means that, the day after enactment, they could pass a new law making permanent all the expiring provisions, and claim a budgetary cost of zero.

Zero revenue cost from any and all tax cuts, forever and ever. danshaviro.blogspot.com/2025/06/zero-r…

Just to reiterate from yesterday, IF YOU ARE USING A CURRENT POLICY BASELINE YOU NEED TO USE IT CONSISTENTLY. Meaning, the Senate GOP can't credit itself with the revenue savings from new phase-outs while claiming a zero revenue cost from eliminating past phase-outs. (1/2)

Thus, the Senate GOP's supposed "current policy baseline" is a fraud and a sham, even if one accepts current policy baselines as a reasonable way to do budget scoring. It needs to be consistent! Not just used here but not used there, using whichever method lowers the score. (2/2)

The Yale Budget Lab estimates a $3 trillion increase in federal debt over 10 years from the Senate bill. But actually $3.7 trillion without the phaseouts (which the Senate claims it could eliminate tomorrow at a revenue cost of zero). budgetlab.yale.edu/research/finan…

"Reagan proved that deficits don't matter" ... until they do.

Coming out soon: cambridge.org/gb/universityp… . Includes a version of my article "Time is, time was: evaluating the use of the life-cycle model as a fiscal tool."

Amazon review of my memoir: Who knew that law professors were so funny? This is a warmhearted and introspective series of vignettes that provide an unexpected insight into the life of young professionals from the 1950s to the 1980s. Always entertaining .... a great read.