Who is doing the most consequential research and public writing / advocacy about kids and AI?

I need to write out how Hypandra is different from the various study modes offered in Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Kagi, etc… My initial reaction is that we aren’t about helping users learn some fixed skill, solve a provided problem, or understand some existing concept.

Pitiful “context” from Google’s AI Overview here: Responding to: "If you have a good search question, Google is great for answering it," he said. "If you don't have a good question, you will get 17 million responses and you will wish you hadn't asked."

Hi Kagi, Is there a process for me to tell you when a website you link to is compromised? I tried to click this result and get redirected:

We recently discussed city blocks as a unit of space/distance/measurement and 3.1 just referred to something in the book we are reading as being in a couple blocks (pages). :)

Curious question!

Every time I read it I love the little playing sandwich in Loris Malaguzzi's 100 languages: ... a hundred ways of thinking of playing, of speaking. ... reggiochildren.it/en/reggio-emil…

I’m hearing younger folks simply using “chat”

Curious q:

OK Copilot.

why is the dominant trend in tech right now the streamlining of seemingly everything that makes life worth living? i want to read my friends and colleagues messages! i want to write my own prose and consume the artistic work of others! i want FRICTION!!