Sam Altman OpenClaw was one of the most ridiculous ideas I've seen in a while. But what it did is go viral. It had the impact Orson Welles had with the radio drama of the alien attack. People who understood science knew it was BS, but this didn't stop hysteria from happening. Here is the

Hendrik Bindu Reddy github.com/TheDarkLightX/…

Other Blockchains hardcodes block validity into the protocol. Tau's Testnet Alpha lets participants rewrite the rules. A lightweight blockchain with User-defined specs. User-defined chains. That's the endgame

x.com/i/article/2023…

Tau Q&A Dec 2025 [8] Kirko: Does toTau Net support privacy features if so how might is it approach compared to privacy focused platforms like zcash? Tau Net Tau $AGRS tau.net

📣 Our February Q & A Is Live This month's Q&A tackles everything from TestNet Alpha plans and KOL strategy to Tau Language's position vs Lean, delegated proof of stake, and Fola's personal commitment to the project. Questions & Timestamps: 0:11 - What's the plan for TestNet?

Crypto Seb CriticalThinker OpenServ Tau Net Qubitcoin There's a tonne of progress made already. Stay tuned!

Tau Testnet dev update: 3 new commits pushed by Andrei. 1. Standalone Docker container workflow for native Tau bindings, you can now build and run a full testnet node from a single Dockerfile without needing to manually fetch and compile tau-lang separately. Includes compose

💼 February Business Team Update – Incentives, Licensing & Website Refresh. Tau Net's business team is laying the groundwork for TestNet Alpha launch with incentive programs for developers, exchanges, and partner projects, alongside a major website redesign and licensing

🛠 February Latest Dev Update – TestNet Hardening & Tau Language development. "We do have the best software specification language ever, much better, many levels better than anything that existed before." – Ohad Asor (18:03) Highlights: - Web wallet live at (testnet . tau .

vitalik.eth There's a better path that does't infer preferences. 97% of DAO holders never participate. The answer to this is architecture where stating your conditions once gives you continuous representation. Formal specifications + MPC is strictly more powerful than natural language +

mert vitalik.eth Yes - Arrow's Impossibility Theorem. But you're assuming the only collective input mechanism is voting. There's a difference between averaging what people want (produces-mid) and discovering what people's requirements logically entail (preserves asymmetric insight). Apply your

Vitalik's outlined the long-standing problem with DAO governance. But the proposed solution of LLMs inferring voting preferences from personal data introduces a fundamental issue: probabilistic inference cannot guarantee faithful representation. An LLM analyzing your writing to

owocki Yes, and we are: x.com/Tau_Net/status…

Tau.net ( $AGRS @ $10m mc) fixes this at the root 🫚 The leap is simple: from "trust the person" to "prove the system."

vitalik.eth Centralized teams will always move faster and ship tighter products on top of that same permissionless base. The missing piece is making collective decision-making as precise and executable as the code itself. If users could formally specify what they want the system to do,

I truly believe we're the one project doing the right thing, in a sea projects doing the wrong thing.

🛠️ Tau Test Net Alpha Dev Update Senior Dev Andrei pushed another big commit yesterday. Here's the breakdown:🧵

7/ - Test stability Stabilized test teardown and refreshed pytest config. More reliable CI means fewer false failures blocking progress. If you've been hesitant to contribute because CI felt unreliable — that's fixed. PRs now get trustworthy test results.