Prof. Griffin (Caleb Griffin) notes that modern contracts are meaningless because individuals must agree to them if they wish to participate in the modern world. He seeks to revitalize the contracting process by . . . digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

Prof. Lee (Jon J. Lee) takes a comprehensive look at private sanctions in the legal profession by analyzing an original empirical study conducted throughout the country over the last 20 years. He concludes that . . . digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

Prof. Rose analyzes recent legal adaptations in sovereign wealth that attempt to manage a more mercantilist and nationalistic orientation from sovereign funds. He outlines a framework for the legal innovations necessary . . . digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

BYU Law recent graduate Abigail Stone argues that bankruptcy courts should consider mental health when determining whether student loans constitute an undue hardship . . . digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

We’re excited to announce that Vol. 48, Issue 5 is now live on our website! Thank you to the scholars who contributed and the students who edited this issue. digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/

Prof. Heyman (of Chicago-Kent Law) inquires into what founding-era Americans thought when incorporating the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to explore the place of religion within a liberal constitutional order. digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

Prof. Kolenc (Antony Barone Kolenc of Ave Maria School of Law) explores a juror’s right to religious liberty by analyzing the prosecution of Democrat Congresswoman Corrine Brown in Northeast Florida. digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

Prof. Minos’ (of Harvard Law School) recent address as the Bruce C. Hafen Lecture at BYU Law School questions whether the law’s role in conflicts over religious and equal treatment is a wall or a bridge. digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

We’re excited to announce the final issue of volume 48 is live on our website. Thank you to all the scholars who contributed and the students who edited this issue. digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/

Prof. Ferzan (Kimberly Kessler Ferzan of @PennLaw), in “The Trouble with Time Served,” illustrates how crediting detainees for time served is perverse because it harms the innocent. digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

Mr. Lindley (Tyler Lindley of BYU Law School) provides a coherent justification for the puzzling law of mootness exceptions within the constitutional model. digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

Prof. Tidmarsh and Marumo (of Notre Dame Law School) use two recent decisions—one prohibiting incentive awards to class representatives and one permitting disgorgement of side payments to class objectors—to explore deeper connections between class-action settlements. . . digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

Our very own Mr. Allred (@allredWyatt of BYU Law School) argues that recent major questions doctrine decisions have departed from textualist principles. digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

Our very own Mr. Anderson (of BYU Law School) makes a case for how grantor trust rules should be reformed by proposing grandfathering provisions that should be included in the reform of the grantor trust rules to ensure . . . digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol4…

As Volume 48 wraps up, thank you to all the students who contributed to this volume and helped make this issue great and this year wonderful. We wish you well in your upcoming legal career.

Welcome to the new editors of Volume 49. We are very excited for this year!