@benignvanilla.bsky.social (@benignvanilla) 's Twitter Profile
@benignvanilla.bsky.social

@benignvanilla

Everyone should have access to basic healthcare, food, clean water and a secondary education. I follow back. #DontMessWithTheMagic

ID: 16223021

calendar_today10-09-2008 16:12:02

86,86K Tweet

1,1K Followers

2,2K Following

John Jackson (@hissgoescobra) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Some key admissions here that can be used in future investigations. He says “we” meaning he’s working with the FCC to politically target liberals. He also says “we’re just getting started” which shows an active conspiracy to violate the civil rights of a broad class of Americans.

Some key admissions here that can be used in future investigations. He says “we” meaning he’s working with the FCC to politically target liberals. He also says “we’re just getting started” which shows an active conspiracy to violate the civil rights of a broad class of Americans.
Joe Walsh (@walshfreedom) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You’re missing the point. It doesn’t matter what Kimmel said. The federal government threatened ABC to suspend/fire Kimmel or there’d be consequences. It was a direct threat issued yesterday, it’s on tape, just hours before ABC suspended him. That’s a direct violation of the

CALL TO ACTIVISM (@calltoactivism) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ARE YOU KIDDING ME? 🚨BREAKING: Fox & Friends just trashed Jimmy Kimmel for “crossing the line” - WHILE Brian Kilmeade, the same guy who said homeless people should be “killed,” SAT RIGHT THERE ON THE COUCH. This is hypocrisy at its most extreme. Are they all this evil??

@benignvanilla.bsky.social (@benignvanilla) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I am not a boycott kind of guy, I hate what Chik-Fil-A stands for, but love their chicken. I am weak. Anyway...I am pretty close to canceling @Hulu/Disney. I don't know how to legally fight back, and I am not ready to go rogue. Is this where we start?

@benignvanilla.bsky.social (@benignvanilla) 's Twitter Profile Photo

First Colbert, then Kimmel. And now...the government...the federal government...is talking about the consequences of their actions. In a court...is this admissable?