AI Safety (@ai_safety) 's Twitter Profile
AI Safety

@ai_safety

How do we keep advanced artificial agents from forcefully intervening in the protocols by which we attempt to communicate what they should accomplish?

ID: 773012118152949760

calendar_today06-09-2016 04:17:05

247 Tweet

122 Followers

33 Following

Americans for Responsible Innovation (@americans4ri) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A 10-year ban on state AI regulation is a lifetime (or two) in tech development. As Josh Hawley says in Politico today, this legislation would hurt consumers and the public as AI innovation accelerates without safeguards. Story: subscriber.politicopro.com/newsletter/202…

A 10-year ban on state AI regulation is a lifetime (or two) in tech development.

As <a href="/HawleyMO/">Josh Hawley</a> says in Politico today, this legislation would hurt consumers and the public as AI innovation accelerates without safeguards.

Story: subscriber.politicopro.com/newsletter/202…
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@repmtg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I will NOT vote for any bill that destroys states rights and lets AI run wild for the next 10 years. AI will replace jobs, especially in the press. This is not a left or right issue. It’s about humanity. I’ll go to the mat on this. If you kill federalism, I’m out.

Future of Life Institute (@fli_org) 's Twitter Profile Photo

‼️ 🇺🇸 Congress is considering a 10-year ban on state AI laws that blocks states from acting on real risks like job loss, disinformation, surveillance, public safety, loss of control, and more. It’s a massive win for Big Tech, and a huge risk for families. 🧵 1/4

Alex Bores (@alexbores) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Jack Clark Anthropic Jack, Anthropic has repeatedly stressed the urgency and importance of the public safety threats it’s addressing, but those issues seem surprisingly absent here. 🧵

Thomas Woodside 🫜 (@thomas_woodside) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Today, the working group established by Governor Newsom after the veto of SB 1047 released their final report. It underscores the urgency of California leading with a “trust but verify” approach to frontier AI governance and is filled with sharp insights. 🧵

Today, the working group established by Governor Newsom after the veto of SB 1047 released their final report. It underscores the urgency of California leading with a “trust but verify” approach to frontier AI governance and is filled with sharp insights. 🧵
MIRI (@miriberkeley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Some huge book endorsements today — from retired three-star general Jack Shanahan, former DHS Under Secretary Suzanne Spaulding, security expert Bruce Schneier, Nobel laureate Ben Bernanke, former US NSC Senior Director Jon Wolfsthal, geneticist George Church, and more!

Some huge book endorsements today — from retired three-star general Jack Shanahan, former DHS Under Secretary Suzanne Spaulding, security expert Bruce Schneier, Nobel laureate Ben Bernanke, former US NSC Senior Director Jon Wolfsthal, geneticist George Church, and more!
Thomas Larsen (@thlarsen) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Lots of people in AI, and especially AI policy, seem to think that aligning superintelligence is the most important issue of our time, and that failure could easily lead to extinction -- like what happened in AI 2027. But they don’t mention this fact in public because it sounds

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@repmtg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Senate is making changes to the AI provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill. Instead of an automatic 10 year moratorium on states to regulate or make laws on AI, they are tying the 10 year AI moratorium to a newly created $500,000,000 broad band account for states. Mostly

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (@marshablackburn) 's Twitter Profile Photo

States should not be punished for trying to protect their citizens from the harms of AI. It’s why 37 state attorneys general and governors across the political spectrum have spoken out against a federal moratorium on the regulation of AI.

Mackenzie Arnold (@mackenz_arnold) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The latest draft of the Temporary Pause / Conditional Moratorium is up, and… it seemingly fails to do what the drafters so clearly want to do. And it’s b/c of the phrase “disproportionate burden”. I think Sen. Marsha Blackburn will want to take a look at this urgently.

ControlAI (@ai_ctrl) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Joe Rogan on superintelligence: "I feel like when people are saying they can control it, I feel like I'm being gaslit. I don't believe them. I don't believe that they believe it, because it just doesn't make sense."

Nate Soares ⏹️ (@so8res) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Event details are at IfAnyoneBuildsIt.com/events. Eliezer and I will also do another Q&A for preorderers in September. And FYI, the book is 25% off on the Barnes And Noble website (with a free account) until Jul 11: barnesandnoble.com/w/if-anyone-bu…

Eliezer Yudkowsky ⏹️ (@esyudkowsky) 's Twitter Profile Photo

if your alignment plan relies on the Internet not being stupid then your alignment plan is terrible if your alignment plan relies on the Internet not being stupid then your alignment plan is terrible if your alignment plan relies on the Internet not being stupid then your

Alex Bores (@alexbores) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Dear every tech trade association who has said that AI regulation will make us lose the race to China...please reply or quote this with your tweet or statement opposing selling AI chips to China. Your silence would be deafening. Tech:NYC American Innovators Network Computer & Communications Industry Association Chamber of Progress

David Krueger (@davidskrueger) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Calling this "training for interpretability" is misleading... it's more like "training that doesn't obviously degrade interpretability". Nobody actually has a method to train for interpretability.

Mauricio Baker (@mauricbaker) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Say the US wants a deal with China on powerful AI. Could we verify that China doesn’t cheat? For the last year, my team produced the most technically detailed overview so far. Our RAND working paper finds: strong verification is possible—but we need ML and hardware research. 🧵

Say the US wants a deal with China on powerful AI. Could we verify that China doesn’t cheat?

For the last year, my team produced the most technically detailed overview so far. Our RAND working paper finds: strong verification is possible—but we need ML and hardware research.
🧵
AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️ (@aisafetymemes) 's Twitter Profile Photo

🎉 China continues to call for NOT RACING! REMINDER 1) Big AI spends a FORTUNE pushing the race narrative ("bUt ChiNa") THIS IS AN OLD TRICK FOR AVOIDING REGULATION: Throughout the Cold War, the military-industrial complex spent a fortune pushing the false narrative that the

🎉 China continues to call for NOT RACING!

REMINDER 1) Big AI spends a FORTUNE pushing the race narrative ("bUt ChiNa")

THIS IS AN OLD TRICK FOR AVOIDING REGULATION: Throughout the Cold War, the military-industrial complex spent a fortune pushing the false narrative that the