Abhishek Raja "Ram" (@abhishekrajaram) 's Twitter Profile
Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

Tax Compliance & Litigation Expert | Author: Speaker: Leader | At War for Justice & Simplification in Tax Laws | Loves Information Technology | 9810638155

ID: 474054180

calendar_today25-01-2012 16:14:40

34,34K Tweet

92,92K Followers

1,1K Following

Abhishek Raja "Ram" (@abhishekrajaram) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Dealing with tax authorities can feel intimidating, but it doesn't have to be. The Quick Do's and Don'ts can help you. Note: When discussing legal citations, a new issue in today's world is the potential for hallucinations by generative AIs. Earlier, there was a need to

Dealing with tax authorities can feel intimidating, but it doesn't have to be.

The Quick Do's and Don'ts can help you.

Note: When discussing legal citations, a new issue in today's world is the potential for hallucinations by generative AIs. Earlier, there was a need to
Abhishek Raja "Ram" (@abhishekrajaram) 's Twitter Profile Photo

SERVICE OF NOTICE U/s 169 S.169 governs deemed service of any decision, order, summons, notice, or communication. Besides regular delivery, deeming provisions include: - Post: Delivery is deemed on the usual arrival date. - Portal/Email: Delivery is deemed when sent to the

SERVICE OF NOTICE U/s 169

S.169  governs deemed service of any decision, order, summons, notice, or communication.

Besides regular delivery, deeming provisions include:
- Post: Delivery is deemed on the usual arrival date.
- Portal/Email: Delivery is deemed when sent to the
Abhishek Raja "Ram" (@abhishekrajaram) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Does the GST Department demand immediate tax deposits during visits, surveys or searches? 1. Shri Nandhi Dhall Mills India Pvt. Ltd. - Madras High Court (2022) 60 GSTL 227 Search at business premises revealed tax evasion by the writ petitioner/first respondent, who paid ₹2

Does the GST Department demand immediate tax deposits during visits, surveys or searches?

1. Shri Nandhi Dhall Mills India Pvt. Ltd. -  Madras High Court
(2022) 60 GSTL 227

 Search at business premises revealed tax evasion by the writ petitioner/first respondent, who paid ₹2
Abhishek Raja "Ram" (@abhishekrajaram) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Bombay High Court held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is unsustainable when additions are based merely on estimates or Sales Tax Department information without independent verification. Since the assessee provided supporting documents and no concealment was proven, the

The Bombay High Court held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is unsustainable when additions are based merely on estimates or Sales Tax Department information without independent verification. Since the assessee provided supporting documents and no concealment was proven, the
Abhishek Raja "Ram" (@abhishekrajaram) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Man's Rolex seized by Customs at Delhi Airport - HC provides relief A Dubai-based Indian traveler, Mahesh, has won a legal battle at the Delhi High Court after his luxury Rolex watch was wrongly classified as a "commercial quantity" by Customs at Indira Gandhi International

Abhishek Raja "Ram" (@abhishekrajaram) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Para 6: This Court finds that by ex parte order the first appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed as he has failed to appear before the authority on 6.4.2021, 24.9.2021 and 2.11.2021. Taking a lenient view, this Court directs the Appellate Authority to reconsider the