Are you a student with no life, that just wants to ship code the entire night and win cool shit for it?👀 Browser Use is co-hosting an overnight agents hackaton together with Vercel Anthropic at Y Combinator offices🔥 Limited spots available🕑 (link below)

how long until people start to realize that there's no super secret epistemic vault that only unlocks after 10yr+ experience. no substantive difference between a competent quant trader, an AI researcher, and an applied mathematician. I can guarantee that if you gave a quant a

once again, another loop on the dialectic has completed, and we begin the next cycle. the masses are drowning in a cultural river that flows in circles. and social media has sped up the spiral exponentially –- thus making the returns exponentially large. you could bet on either

a frequent mistake I see leftists (followers) make is that they believe that many of their positions, such as economic ones, are detached from ideology. but every seemingly quantitative or technical stance (minimum wage, tax codes, redistribution, debt relief) orbits a larger

though I respect Naval, I believe his definition of intelligence isn't sufficient, as it falls into circular reasoning, his quote: "The only real test of intelligence is if you get what you want out of life, and the second part of that is wanting the right things." but what are

the fact that people are getting oneshotted by tiktok edits of Gavin Newsom shows how malleable public perception really is. a random kid in his basement can post looksmaxxing edits and shift the future of the country more than a political strategist with 20yr+ experience the

I never really understood protests, to chant names, and throw rocks, even the idea of setting a date for one sounds satire. “hey bro, we’re overthrowing the system on saturday the 22nd, you coming?” if you were truly angered so much at the system, would you wait until the

Stephen Wolfram has the best articulated argument against AI doom I've heard. what does it mean for us if AI becomes smarter than humans, if we are no longer the apex intelligence? if we live in a world where there are lots of things taking place that are smarter than we are --

hyperpersonalization is oneshotting humanity to doom. from the very start, societies split into different groups through ideological differences, since everyone couldn’t agree on everything, they took the most important things they did agree on, disregarded the minor

it was always somewhat of a mystery to me how left wing/right wing got voters. obviously liberals vote left, conservatives vote right, and then there are the people in the middle who get persuaded. so how do you persuade the middle? by being right wing? no -- there’s no

the network state has gained it's biggest advantage over the nation state with decentralized AI. with Prime Intellect democratizing intelligence, the network state now has it's own currency (crypto), voting layer (prediction markets), and a compute layer. the age old giant is

the main critiques of Elon Musk from IQ100 normies is that he’s a liar, doesn’t deliver on his promises, and he’s actually just a good businessman whose engineers do all the real work. makes me wonder whether the arbitrary “30 IQ point gap” is drastic enough to describe the

interesting phenomenon how physical distance has such a strong effect on human morals. if there’s a child drowning in front of you, you’d feel morally obliged to jump in and save him. but if a cashier asks you to donate to a charity that would save a drowning child somewhere in

there are 2 archetypes of people: the normies who desperately cling to statistics, studies, “facts” > “hey, so my opinion is based on x and y statistics, backed by the study from 2018, which gives me reason to speculate that..” and the second type: the vibesmaxxed /