4common_cents (@4common_cents) 's Twitter Profile
4common_cents

@4common_cents

ID: 1771797609545416704

calendar_today24-03-2024 07:14:35

369 Tweet

87 Followers

91 Following

MT (@mtinsav) 's Twitter Profile Photo

4common_cents Debbie Ellis Joe 🥋 Ross Dellenger Another thing: Many athletes are not even asking for payment/schollies. They simply just want to compete. So schools saying they have an expense problem bc they need to “fully fund” every roster spot is just BS. Plenty of swimmers would be happy just staying on the team.

Kristen (@kristenciezak) 's Twitter Profile Photo

4common_cents Laura Reathaford Michael D. H. Hsu Sam C. Ehrlich CharlieBaker_Parody Roster Limit Objection 4common_cents I don’t know who you are, but you would have my vote - NCAA president, Supreme Court judge, president of the United States, whatever. I really appreciate your ability to both articulate and simplify the disaster that is House.

4common_cents (@4common_cents) 's Twitter Profile Photo

House v NCAA - Top 10 reasons why the settlement should be rejected. 1) There is no class representative for the injunctive relief (IR) class - this is a basic requirement in a class axn - House and Prince are done competing in the NCAA and will not be impacted by the injunctive

Tom Mars (@tommarslaw) 's Twitter Profile Photo

People who assume the House v. NCAA class action settlement will be finally approved just because the federal judge had given preliminary approval apparently don’t realize that “preliminary”means just that. In Powers v. Filters Fast, LLC,

4common_cents (@4common_cents) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Sam C. Ehrlich This is a bit confusing. If the “defendants” are not getting releases for rev share cap, third party clearinghouse, or roster limits - - why would they want the injunctive relief settlement? All it does is give Class Counsel a cut of the action while guaranteering they spend the

Amanda Christovich (@achristovichh) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Judge Wilken has preserved the right for both current and future athletes to sue for damages based on the implementation of roster limits and the cap on revenue-sharing.

Joe Sabin, Esq. (@sabo21) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Sam C. Ehrlich Kristi Dosh This is the same logic that brought you hits like "OK we know caps are an illegal restraint of trade and we can't cap compensation at $0... but what if we cap it at $20.5m?"

Mit Winter (@wintersportslaw) 's Twitter Profile Photo

An item to keep an eye on with respect to the House settlement. How quickly do appeals come? Will they seek a stay of the settlement’s injunctive relief (salary cap, collective/booster restrictions, roster limits)? If they seek a stay, does the 9th Circuit approve the request?

Cory (@coryrg123) 's Twitter Profile Photo

4common_cents Sam C. Ehrlich So what you’re saying is athletes who were cut for roster limits can now sue for damages unless the school elect to grandfather them in? Is that right? @therealshenger Mit Winter Tom Mars Joe Sabin, Esq. Laura Reathaford Sam C. Ehrlich

Marsha Lycan (@mlycan12) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The whole Designated Student Athlete (DSA) process that was an amendment to the House v NCAA Settlement is an absolute joke. The issue was the fact that so many student athletes were preemptively cut (from rosters or from their verbal commitments) bc the legal professionals in