Twitter Beğeni Hilesi

I'm torn on this but my instinct is that it's a net positive. To hit .350, even in high school, isn't easy and baseball is heavily a mental game. This shows that he can think and adjust and compete.

???

Losers lose.

Kevin Garnett is a gifted story teller. If you haven't seen this full interview, it's truly worth 90 minutes of your time. Funny, insightful, surprising, and very engaging.

I wrote a reflection on the recent dust-up about Churchill. I found much of the controversy to be a major distraction. People are avoiding confronting a difficult truth: "It’s easier, in a sense, to accept that we were never morally good and never civilizationally great than it

Read the whole thing here: americanreformer.org/2024/09/are-we…

Nope.

This is important. The belief that we were never good is both wrong and deeply destructive to our national psyche. The truth is harder though, which is that we once we were both good and great and that the dual calamity of wars and wealth created generations that squandered

I've not seen anyone else talk about this, so I will: The legacy of the "Woke" era in entertainment has been to sacrifice the careers and reputations of talented women and minorities by placing them in doomed projects that will inevitably draw severe backlash. The "diversity"

There is some truth to this. Homosexual behavior in men is largely an expression of a fetish for transgression combined with absolute contempt for women.

Utterly obsessed with this UCL researcher who won an Ig Nobel for showing that “Blue Zones” where people supposedly live well past 100 at unusual rates are actually just full of clerical errors and people committing pension fraud ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news/2024/…

I think people are attracted to this girl, not because we miss dirty hippie chicks, but because she is presenting herself honestly, without a layer of ironic distance. She's not burying her own personality under layers of memes like "I'm in my dirtball era" or "It's a wook girl

This is the consequence of destroying America's actual native culture (Anglo-Saxon Puritans) and replacing it with "global melting pot "

Paragraphs like this a classic leftist nonsense. What does it mean to "liberate women from the systems men made?" What systems? How does one assess who made a system? What if women were involved? Is it outcome only? What if outcome varies by time or culture? What even is a

Two points: 1. If true (it isn't but that's for #2) then it'd only be true for one generation, assuming women lived accordingly. Then there are no more people. 2. This conclusion isn't actually true. It's just another short-term survey. Ask them when they're 50 or 60 and the

Important thread regarding federal action to destroy Silvergate Bank.

This is wrong. It mistakes what the US is. It's not a generic economic zone that's trying to max GDP. The US is an effort to cultivate a people sufficiently moral that they can self-govern. Prosperity is just a byproduct of that moral calculus. Our English forefathers managed

The reason black musical culture shifted in the 1990's to angry "gangsta rap" wasn't because of racism or crime or poverty or injustice or the police. It was because all of the performers were getting raped and humiliated by guys like "Diddy." They channeled their humiliation

This is an excellent point. Even from a purely anecdotal perspective, this is true. I hired many moms who'd left the workforce and reentered a decade or more later, and they were great. They handled chaos, worked hard, and were highly responsive to change. The never-married,

To sell out your people for so small a temptation as money, is truly one of the most despicable of crimes. The crime of Judas.