
David Smethurst
@dsmethurst66
social housing and neighbourhood sustainability consultant and united supporter wondering which of the above has the bleaker outlook
ID: 1125649094
27-01-2013 17:15:17
21,21K Tweet
1,1K Followers
1,1K Following

David Smethurst I absolutely think that is their goal. Make us get used to the idea that it could be our tech. Then remove the NHI from the equation. The interesting thing is that they have to prove it at some point. Show some reverse engineered tech and tell us "we had this since the 50s"




Phi Pha Pho Phum David Smethurst x.com/avirupm42/stat…

Thanks to both Phi Pha Pho Phum and Cigarette Smoking Nicowraith for reminding me about this A lot of you will rember this from a while ago. I thought it was very significant at the time and the work done was very convincing. But having nothing to hang it on I ,like many others I suspect, put

Hey. ufonaut with pancakes and Joanne Gardiner I found this interview which I think is the key one podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/eco… There is another one as well with Ryan graves and Hal putoff which you can search for nearby in the episode lists

D. Dean Johnson I will be submitting similar language shortly.

Chris Ramsay Certainty requires knowing the distance to the object so you can compute the velocity from the angular velocity. If it is only a few km away, those turns are not physically possible with our understanding of physics



From September, we'll be entering an important time. One hearing expected, potential new revelations, increased political engagement and decisions on whether to include the UAPDA within the NDAA. New UAP legislation is crucial to transparency: in this piece, Kevin Wright



This is a great thread from Eric Weinstein which brilliantly illustrates the small minded dismissal of colleagues who don’t even know enough to know they should know better. It also rather cleverly explains the basis of his approach to a lay person like me who knows a bit but



Steven Greenstreet 🐷 Hey, Steven Greenstreet 🐷, remember when you *intentionally* misquoted Elizondo? The question, now, is whether you are: (1) A clown performing tabloid-style BS for clicks (fitting for a NY Post video editor) or, (2) An intentional disinformation agent Which one is it?