Thomas Jefferson's Kentucky Resolutions of 1798: An Introduction Tenth Amendment Center [rumble.com/v1tnjtq-thomas… MichaelBoldin Boldin: History ignored: Three foundational principles of the American Revolution in Thomas Jefferson's Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 TenthAmendmentCenter

Patrick Henry’s Virginia Resolves: Bedrock Principles of American Liberty | Tenth Amendment Center Michael Boldin tenthamendmentcenter.com/2024/05/28/pat… MichaelBoldin Mike Maharrey TenthAmendmentCenter Brewster2024 Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

Not Just Bad Policy: The Founders Called it Treason and War | Tenth Amendment Center MichaelBoldin Boldin tenthamendmentcenter.com/2025/04/02/not… TenthAmendmentCenter

⚔️ The Militia the Founders Envisioned vs What Remains Today It was the people themselves Armed and trained The backbone of liberty A standing army serves rulers A citizen militia secures freedom👇 tenthamendmentcenter.com/2025/08/15/the…

"I support the 2nd Amendment...but" Means you are a gun grabber.

Gun grabber alert - basically the same line as Gavin Newsom - "I support the 2nd Amendment completely - BUT" These people are NOT 2nd Amendment supporters, since there is no exception to "shall not be infringed"

This is example #400,020,332 of how "constitutional conservatives" are NOT constitutionalists. Their top goal is conservative social policy, and they'll push for the constitution - when it fits that social policy. Just like the progressive left.

Jack Poso 🇺🇸 The real enemy is the largest government in history - violating all our rights 24/7/365 We'll go with Thomas Paine over anyone saying we should ignore the constitution to get the "enemy"

FEAR is the foundation of government power. This pretend 2nd Amendment supporter - like millions of others - are no different than Gavin Newsom - who continually says he supports the 2nd, with "common sense" regulations.

This gun grabber goes so far as to shame real 2nd Amendment supporters, calling them a "fool" for allowing a "risky" person near their family with a gun. The REAL FOOL? People who trust government to protect you - rather than use every power you give them - against you.

TARIFFS: America’s Forgotten First Economic Debate 🔥 TARIFFS: America’s first economic war wasn’t free trade vs protectionism. It was power vs power. Subsidies on one side. Trade weapons on the other. Hamilton versus Jefferson & Madison. 👇 [rumble.com/v6y5fiy-tariff…]

🔓 Life. Liberty. Property. And the right to defend them. “...in the best manner they can” Samuel Adams didn’t list them for decoration He named them as rights you exercise Not privileges you beg for

Arbitrary Nihilism St. George Tucker explained duty under the oath - bound to oppose any federal act that violates the constitution - and not after another branch gives permission by also calling it unconstitutional: "the several departments and officers of the governments, both federal, and

Not one single founder - not Hamilton, not Madison, not Jefferson or anyone - EVER claimed the President could impose tariffs on his own. Tariff power - was legislative - and everyone knew it. And no, one branch cannot just hand off its power to another branch.

Not one person can point us to the clause of the Constitution which authorizes the PRESIDENT to unilaterally implement tariffs. BECAUSE THAT CLAUSE DOES NOT EXIST. Instead, they just give us leftist trash excuses - which describes literally every argument that can be made on

"But congress passed a law that said the president can do this" YEAH, Congress has passed a lot of unconstitutional garbage over the years. But this argument is foundational to the constitution. It's the claim that one branch can take the power that was carefully delegated to

Another we've heard a lot, oddly enough - just says "Tariffs are constitutional, it's the one main thing they can do" It's as if they've heard SOME words from the Constitution, but can't tell the difference between legislative and executive power at all. They know less about

The most common one we get - and we see this all day, every day - a version of this: "Congress is filled with criminals, you WANT criminals conducting our trade policy???" That's simply - "ignore the constitution when I don't like the results" - the oldest tool of tyrants in

George Washington WARNED us about people who want to IGNORE the Constitution when they don't like the results, or think the powers should be different. He called that a WEAPON to destroy freedom. "If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the

The REAL judicial activism in the TARIFF case: The judges gave way too much deference to modern precedent and delegation of power from one branch to another. They didn’t come down nearly hard enough on this issue. Not even close. Tariffs are a legislative power. And all the