Is he really this dense, or am I missing something? Why on earth would we factor motorways in 1980, and compare them to motorways of today 🤦🏻‍♂️🤨🤣

So, you could've made it then. With or without Highways, because you drove it there anyway. Any vehicle approaching you must adhere to rule 146 of the highway code and expect the unexpected. Sounds like you made the wrong decision by stopping IMHO.

Another MP is trying to get a few votes in the upcoming elections. Shock. He's massively ill-informed and needs to check his facts. Smart-motorways are the safest roads the UK has.

It's driver error 99.9% of the time, the only time it's not driver error, is when it's a medical episode.

Lying MP tags lying false road safety campaign group.

Typical trumpton.

For the millionth time, measuring per mile is not accurate and never will be an accurate way of measuring risk to road users. It doesn't take into account the capacity of the motorway. A 4 lane ALR carries more traffic than a 3 lane section with hardshoulder. Hence, per HMVM.

Dislikes smart motorways, but this is his excuse for A roads 🤦🏻‍♂️

Since when do roads cause RTCs? Last time I checked it was bad driving.

Not a single person was killed when technology went down. Not a single one.

Cracking article written by a friend of mine. Read it, share it, make it known! drive.google.com/file/d/1pgQBn2…

Where's the logic? bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…

The statistics come from real world events? They're not made up. If you refuse to believe that, then prove otherwise. But unfortunately, you can't. The road design has nothing to do with incidents on motorways. They're straight with good visibility of at least 300yds at all times

Pot. Kettle.

And that ladies and gentlemen is what's wrong with the motoring public. Stats prove them safer, yet he still doesn't like them 🤦🏻‍♂️