We know things move fast. That's why we're focused on shipping products that actually carry the value of what we've built. You can build something overnight. Building something worth using is a different thing entirely. We start from what developers(users) actually need, then

sunday reset. GM!

I have my own choice.

ran Raydium AMM through parity.cx/verepo. 72/100. structure, security, error handling all solid. testing coverage is the only thing dragging it down.

pump.fun (@pumpfun) nearing $1B in revenue. millions of tokens launched. almost none audited. parity exists so agents stop shipping vulnerable code before anyone notices. verepo for instant scoring. security skills for everything else.

Got a question for you all. how many times have you shipped something convinced it was solid, then found the issue later? thinking about this because it’s exactly the problem parity is built around. agents write confident code. confident code still has bugs.

holding $PRT is a bet on agents. we're just the skills layer

the gap isn't writing solana code. agents are decent at that. the gap is knowing which patterns are dangerous and why. that's what we're building into the context engine.

the code looked fine. it was not fine. Verepo knew.

GM I'm excited because I'm almost ready to show something new. 😎

agents write solana programs pretty well now. the problem is they write them the way a competent generalist would. not the way someone who’s read a hundred audit reports would.

Your agent wrote the code. parity made sure it survives.

good problems to have. lot of ground to cover, know exactly where i’m going.

sorry but our agents are basically four steps ahead. while everyone’s still debating whether AI can write secure Solana code, parity agents are already auditing with real exploit context baked in. skill. context. verification. shipping.

we don’t want you to think about parity. we want your agent to think with it.

agents write solana programs fine. the problem is they don't know what they don't know. missing signer checks, unvalidated PDAs, unsafe CPI calls. none of it shows up as a compile error. it just ships. that's the gap parity closes.

the flywheel isn't complicated. devs add parity skills to their agents. agents make skill calls. better usage data makes the context engine sharper. sharper context attracts more devs. it just compounds. no magic to it.

skills are ready to plug into your agent and the playground needs no setup to get started.

CA : BNrpFEKRxaJhXQcnzMJgdQbxZ31scz37uX6DA7t3pump We had issue when we locked our token - we'll use jupiter lock this time.