Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile
Parity

@paritydotcx

Where contracts meet intelligent verification.

ID: 2022452623623012352

linkhttps://parity.cx/ calendar_today13-02-2026 23:27:40

129 Tweet

224 Followers

7 Following

Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

We know things move fast. That's why we're focused on shipping products that actually carry the value of what we've built. You can build something overnight. Building something worth using is a different thing entirely. We start from what developers(users) actually need, then

We know things move fast. That's why we're focused on shipping products that actually carry the value of what we've built.

You can build something overnight. Building something worth using is a different thing entirely. We start from what developers(users) actually need, then
Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ran Raydium AMM through parity.cx/verepo. 72/100. structure, security, error handling all solid. testing coverage is the only thing dragging it down.

ran <a href="/Raydium/">Raydium</a> AMM through parity.cx/verepo. 72/100. structure, security, error handling all solid. testing coverage is the only thing dragging it down.
Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

pump.fun (@pumpfun) nearing $1B in revenue. millions of tokens launched. almost none audited. parity exists so agents stop shipping vulnerable code before anyone notices. verepo for instant scoring. security skills for everything else.

pump.fun (@pumpfun) nearing $1B in revenue. millions of tokens launched. almost none audited.
parity exists so agents stop shipping vulnerable code before anyone notices. verepo for instant scoring. security skills for everything else.
Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Got a question for you all. how many times have you shipped something convinced it was solid, then found the issue later? thinking about this because it’s exactly the problem parity is built around. agents write confident code. confident code still has bugs.

Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

the gap isn't writing solana code. agents are decent at that. the gap is knowing which patterns are dangerous and why. that's what we're building into the context engine.

Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

agents write solana programs pretty well now. the problem is they write them the way a competent generalist would. not the way someone who’s read a hundred audit reports would.

Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

sorry but our agents are basically four steps ahead. while everyone’s still debating whether AI can write secure Solana code, parity agents are already auditing with real exploit context baked in. skill. context. verification. shipping.

Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

agents write solana programs fine. the problem is they don't know what they don't know. missing signer checks, unvalidated PDAs, unsafe CPI calls. none of it shows up as a compile error. it just ships. that's the gap parity closes.

Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

the flywheel isn't complicated. devs add parity skills to their agents. agents make skill calls. better usage data makes the context engine sharper. sharper context attracts more devs. it just compounds. no magic to it.

Parity (@paritydotcx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

CA : BNrpFEKRxaJhXQcnzMJgdQbxZ31scz37uX6DA7t3pump We had issue when we locked our token - we'll use jupiter lock this time.