MakeCaliBetter (@makecalibetter) 's Twitter Profile
MakeCaliBetter

@makecalibetter

ID: 1426619415060094982

calendar_today14-08-2021 18:59:40

279 Tweet

28 Followers

141 Following

MakeCaliBetter (@makecalibetter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Actually CA law states that a proposition is only allowed to address a single issue. Unlike our Legislators who, indeed, would've been allowed to include requirement for affordable units in their bills. Clearly that wasn't an oversight! Jeff Collins Liam Dillon Michael Smolens

Our Neighborhood Voices (@ourvoicesca) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Politicians have handed a blank check to developers to build six units or more right next to our homes w/o new contributions to new transit, schools, or roads — & without our ability to speak out about what’s happening. Help us fight back & win here: ourneighborhoodvoices.com

MakeCaliBetter (@makecalibetter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

So, how do you justify now the decision to tell those same black communities, who've worked so hard to overcome those roadblocks, that they now don't deserve to have homes with yards and lawns?

MakeCaliBetter (@makecalibetter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

And here I thought the desire for local control is exactly why we have Charter Cities in California, where it should remain a sacred principle, as well! #PressComplicitInSilence #DeveloperGreed Jeff Collins Michael Smolens Andrew Bowen (he/him) Vice President JD Vance Ian James #OurNeighborhoodVoices.com

Our Neighborhood Voices (@ourvoicesca) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Working families don't have the funds it takes to split lots. Developers do. When it comes down to a fight btw an average CA family trying to buy a home & a developer trying to upzone that same lot - our families will lose. Stand up for CA families here: ourneighborhoodvoices.com

John Gonzales (@johngonzalesla1) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Remember the YIMBY claim that no one wants to disallow others from having single-family homes? This proposal is from YIMBY dominated Culver City, which has a lot of its single-family homes on R-2 zoned lots. A “floor on number of units” almost surely would forbid only one unit.

Remember the YIMBY claim that no one wants to disallow others from having single-family homes?  This proposal is from YIMBY dominated Culver City, which has a lot of its single-family homes on R-2 zoned lots. A “floor on number of units” almost surely would forbid only one unit.
MakeCaliBetter (@makecalibetter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

People of all sizes, shapes, skin tones and beliefs appreciate space for their kids to play in! Join us at #OurNeighborhoodVoices.com/Action to get Sacramento out of our towns! #DeveloperGifts #PressComplicitinSilence Jeff Collins Michael Smolens Andrew Khouri 🇷🇺 🇧🇾 🇷🇸 🇱🇧 🇰🇵 Andrew Bowen (he/him)

the YIMBY homestead plan (@savemarinwood) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Rather than a court battle over SB 9 and SB 10, the city of Woodside and Wiener have agreed to a single round, no-holds-barred fight – winner take all. Woodside has Skippy, the mountain lion, on their side.The vultures are already waiting.. Liam Dillon Mike McGuire Senator Scott Wiener

Rather than a court battle over SB 9 and SB 10,  the city of Woodside and Wiener have agreed to a single round, no-holds-barred fight – winner take all.  Woodside has Skippy, the mountain lion, on their side.The vultures are already waiting.. <a href="/dillonliam/">Liam Dillon</a> <a href="/ilike_mike/">Mike McGuire</a> <a href="/Scott_Wiener/">Senator Scott Wiener</a>
MakeCaliBetter (@makecalibetter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It also makes NO SENSE for you to continue to ignore all the facts and allow coal workers and KY citizens to believe that mining is a smart thing (for anyone but you and your broker) and yet you do just that! #FollowTheMoney

MakeCaliBetter (@makecalibetter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Perhaps that's because we all know (and some even admit) that the RHNA numbers "the state says it needs" are outrageously, incorrectly, fixed! Here's to finally having an Audit. Maybe truth will come out? Probably not so much! #DeveloperGifts #FollowTheMoney

MakeCaliBetter (@makecalibetter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

"The...law doesn’t mention additional traffic, public safety + infrastructure needs req'd by added density that “has not been considered in our planning.. and even if it were considered in our planning, it doesn’t mean that we have the capacity to handle the changes in land use.”

MakeCaliBetter (@makecalibetter) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Thank you, Torrance, Redondo Beach and Carson, for calling the state out on bullsh#t pretense that dozens of laws pushed thru Sacto are intended to fix the affordable housing crisis. Rather, they are beautifully crafted to enhance profits for corporate investors + developers.

Sharon Byrne (@sharonevolving) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Hey YIMBY! Who are we building all this housing FOR? Short answer: Investors! Oh, did you hope 'build more' led (someday) to decreased prices? Here's what increased density did for Vancouver. vancouverisawesome.com/real-estate/co…