Richard Windsor (@lrlodges) 's Twitter Profile
Richard Windsor

@lrlodges

ID: 365208273

calendar_today31-08-2011 01:29:51

14,14K Tweet

239 Followers

834 Following

Mark Hemingway (@heminator) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The lag on these things is quite noticeable, in real world conditions the fuel savings negligible, and they tax your battery and cause maintenance issues. Scolding people for not wanting a crappy driving experience is why people hate climate alarmists.

Tom Fitton (@tomfitton) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Fact check: Carbon dioxide was never, is not, nor ever will be a "pollutant" -- no matter what power-hungry corrupt leftist politicians say.

Judith Curry (@curryja) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The EPA ruling is available. The EPA is declining to issue a finding on the science. The rescission is based strictly on the legal argument that the EPA never had authority to regulate GHGs and the recent SCOTUS rulings forbid the EPA staff from improvising rulemaking

Ryan Maue (@ryanmaue) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You have this backwards: The "endangerment finding" was an administrative decision not a scientific assessment. The EPA "technical support document" was a compilation of previous science reports curated by federal employees in "support" of the EF, and not an independent

Jeff Clark (@jeffclarkus) 's Twitter Profile Photo

You didnโ€™t think all the environmental NGOs and litigation shops in America suing to pump out more and more regulation and to block any attempt at deregulation were organic did you? A group of State AGs knows better and they are seeing how these groups are funded by China to

Ryan Maue (@ryanmaue) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I'm sure you've seen NGOs squawking about the DOE Climate Working Group science report. 17 years ago, EPA produced a "Technical Support Document" for the Endangerment Finding under a sham "peer review" process that was covered up until an Inspector General investigation.

I'm sure you've seen NGOs squawking about the DOE Climate Working Group science report.  

17 years ago, EPA produced a "Technical Support Document" for the Endangerment Finding under a sham "peer review" process that was covered up until an Inspector General investigation.
Watts Up With That (@wattsupwiththat) 's Twitter Profile Photo

๐—ข๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜ ๐——๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป ๐—”๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ด Democrats are losing it after President Trump repealed the Obama-era Endangerment Finding, a key climate regulation that let the EPA overreach on greenhouse gas

๐—ข๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜ ๐——๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป ๐—”๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ด
Democrats are losing it after President Trump repealed the Obama-era Endangerment Finding, a key climate regulation that let the EPA overreach on greenhouse gas
Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) 's Twitter Profile Photo

๐Ÿšจ NOW: DC and Maryland Democrats are STILL pumping raw sewage DIRECTLY into waterways leading to the Potomac River, with NO end in sight Where the hell are the environmentalists??! Oh thatโ€™s right โ€” they donโ€™t care, b/c this isnโ€™t politically expedient

Chris Martz (@chrismartzwx) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Environmentalists will scream at the top of their lungs all day every day about how plastic straws and cow farts are destroying the planet, but havenโ€™t said a peep about the 250+ million gallons of RAW SEWAGE leaking into the Potomac. Where are yโ€™all?

Feni๐• Ammunition (@fenixammunition) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The environmentalists are so Trump deranged they're defending the dumping of raw sewage into a river because it's being done by Democrats, lmao.

Logan Dobson (@logandobson) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is wonky but important look at the 2009 EPA greenhouse gas emissions regulations that were just repealed: Water vapor (yes, regular water vapor) is actually a more potent greenhouse gas (as in, it holds more heat) than many of the other ones the Obama Administration wanted

Ryan Maue (@ryanmaue) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The EPA does not have authority to "fight climate change" EPA has statutory authority to enforce the Clean Air Act not "regulate the climate" If the policy goal is to fight climate change, then "Major Questions Doctrine" requires Congressional say-so. This is fraud.

Katie Pavlich (@katiepavlich) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If a private company spilled 300 MILLION gallons of raw sewage into a waterway, not to mention one lined by big populations of people, they would be held accountable, prosecuted & fined. DOJ shouldnโ€™t let DC Water slide, this disaster is an abomination and massively destructive.

Aidan Morrison (@footnotesguy) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The cult of climate hysteria is collapsing. Hard. For a couple decades it would be have been unthinkable to shirt-front an international peak body like IEA for peddling nonsense. But there it is.

Ryan Maue (@ryanmaue) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Well, that should tell everyone that in current construction of the Supreme Court, the Endangerment Finding to "regulate the climate" is dead and buried. No Congressional authority to "fight climate change" through Clean Air Act.

Western Lensman (@westernlensman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

2012. MSNBCโ€™s Alex Wagner and Neera Tanden rip Boston Bruins player Tim Thomas for not going to the White House after the team was invited by Obama for winning the Stanley Cup. Tanden: โ€œThis is kind of the hyper-partisanship that just irritates everybody." โ€œIt's like, just go