Daniel Tomlinson (@dan_tomlinson_) 's Twitter Profile
Daniel Tomlinson

@dan_tomlinson_

account no longer in use, please head to: @dan4barnet

ID: 21243066

calendar_today18-02-2009 21:29:01

4,4K Tweet

4,4K Followers

1,1K Following

Daniel Tomlinson (@dan_tomlinson_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

As the discussion rumbles on, let's not forget that 44% of all households without anyone in work + receiving PIP experienced food insecurity in 2022-23. Massively paring back PIP without providing any replacement is a road to even deeper hardship for these families.

As the discussion rumbles on, let's not forget that 44% of all households without anyone in work + receiving PIP experienced food insecurity in 2022-23.

Massively paring back PIP without providing any replacement is a road to even deeper hardship for these families.
The New Statesman (@newstatesman) 's Twitter Profile Photo

“Instead of coaching Britons comfortably into the workforce, the DWP and Jobcentres demand they take poor-quality jobs, often inappropriate for their life circumstances and expertise.” 🖊️ Anoosh Chakelian newstatesman.com/comment/2024/0…

Tom Pollard (@pollardtom) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This The New Statesman piece by Anoosh Chakelian covers work NEF is undertaking to explore alternative approaches to harsh & prescriptive benefits conditionality Here's what we've found so far & why this issue is critical for any government serious about improving employment outcomes...🧵

Daniel Tomlinson (@dan_tomlinson_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

So many people receiving disability benefits are in deep financial hardship. Cutting eligibility without any reckoning with the inadequacy of the social security safety is not the answer.

Daniel Tomlinson (@dan_tomlinson_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Worth reading this important report from Z2K. We can't reform incapacity and disability benefits without grasping the nettle of our inadequate social security system.

Z2K (Zacchaeus 2000 Trust) (@z2k_trust) 's Twitter Profile Photo

1/5: Government says that its benefits reforms are designed to address economic inactivity. But it’s ignored the two biggest ways the benefits system increases inactivity: inadequacy and risk 🧵.