"Democracy is under threat—so let’s limit who gets to speak", says the guy who locks replies. At least he's consistent. I guess true freedom depends on sanctioned speakers vs free speech. Hard to defend open discourse when you're afraid of replies.

Noticing that the "democracy is under threat - so let's limit who gets to speak" crowd also locks comments. At least it's consistent. I guess true freedom depends on approved speech and approved speakers only. What are they afraid of?

Good job Pierre Poilievre, Mark Carney and Yves-F. Blanchet 🎗⚜️ Dignified. Clear. True to your pitch and platform. Easy to feel proud as a Canadian with handshakes & goodwill at the end. Voters now choose which plan resonates. Embarrassed for overtalker Jagmeet Singh 🤦🏻‍♂️

Democracy isn’t a test of agreement. It’s a test of acceptance once the votes are counted. Easier when a result matches your vote. Harder when not. No less important. Not the result I hoped for. But the majority spoke. Proud it wasn’t contested. Let's build.

Why the fire sometimes goes out mid journey, and what to do about it. Many thanks Tyler Chisholm open.spotify.com/episode/4Lb7Z5…

Any sentence that begins with "we need to..." is the language of futility and impotence. The speaker thinks they're saying something value. But in this case their "we" means "not me". If you really want to say something, begin your sentence with "I'm going to...".

Life scripts aren’t powerful because we don’t know their outline — they’re powerful because our blindness prevents us from matching the outline to the decisive steps we’re taking right now - which are unknowingly carrying out the script. For example, we fear being alone. So