far too much airtime for guys walking around in their Big Boy pants trying to argue that the Occupied Territories Bill is purely symbolic and won’t achieve anything, but also such a threat to Israel and the US that our “greatest ally” would destroy the Irish economy in response

This is disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. “Local people”. Those local people are some of the best journalists in the world. But Palestinians can’t be trusted. Also the implication that the BBC journalists would somehow be superior. Do they hear themselves?

Here’s one of Israel’s top propagandists, fresh off an Israeli military-backed PR tour of GHF "aid" sites, lamenting that Israel can’t legally assassinate journalists it dislikes.

Remember when I said “Labour’s racism crisis” was just bleakly cynical opportunists turning an extremely nasty ongoing squabble about Israel within the Jewish community into a spiked bat to beat their enemies with? And then nine hundred angry wankers shouted abuse at me all day.

Three weeks ago, with +60 Members of the European Parliament, we asked Kaja Kallas to convene an emergency meeting of the Foreign Affairs Council to take action against Israel. Last night, she called a meeting. No action was taken. None. Europe continues to arm and fund Israel.

Every week I think we’re hit rock bottom, but each week new lows by the NYT. Incitement to murder as editorial policy

Just the guy everyone wants to hear from: Anthony Blinken suggests recognition of a Palestinian state is being done too hastily and must contain conditions

This is obscene and disgusting. Completely selective, racist, pandering to the public’s ignorance and of course a quote from The Washington Institute for Near East Policy’s token Palestinian with no mention WINEP was created by AIPAC and is a propaganda arm of the Israel lobby.

An actually real, genuine “the fish rots from the head” moment. Very little of this type of idiotic shit rises organically from the public, it has been imposed from above by politicians and media outlets, over decades. It still is, now.

Imagine if 5 New York Times journalists were targeted and killed and Al Jazeera wrote an article about how the NYT “angered governments”

When I said the various Rowlings and Linehans of Britain were assuming and hoping for the public to act as the unpaid enforcement arm of their crank movement, this is precisely what I meant. theguardian.com/world/2025/aug…

In 2018, Israel murdered Yasser Murtaja & claimed he was a "Hamas security operative." They released pics of him & screenshots of tweets to justify this claim (just like Anas now). Then we learned Hamas had once arrested & beaten Murtaja & he received money from USAID for his

I wonder what would happen if Israel assassinated a Western journalist. Not in Gaza where they cannot go but in London or New York because it disliked a piece

What about the other journalists killed alongside Anas al Sharif? IDF spokesperson: we're fabricating evidence against them as we speak.

Now the IDF is claiming أنس الشريف Anas Al-Sharif was "getting a paycheck from Hamas." Think about how stupid they assume you are to believe that. As the BBC recently reported, and as common sense tells you, Hamas doesn't send out paychecks. They have agents secretly meet employees in

More smoke and mirrors from the ‘rest of the West’ (i.e. apart from the USA). Unless states actually *break* with Israel, seriously disrupting its comfortable position in Western military, political, economic and cultural networks, and break with Trump, this has minimal effect.

Israel has killed (conservatively) an avg of ~100 Palestinians a day for 675 days and people still feign outrage that exactly (1) day of killing doesn’t remain the alpha and omega of moral consideration. This is pure narcissism and racism. Palestinians are simply seen as subhuman

From providing intellectual inspiration for the murder of children on Utøya to providing intellectual cover for the murder of children in Gaza: she is at least consistent.

Compete capitulation by the UN today. The backstory: 1. Israel accused Hamas of using SA as a weapon of war, demanding they be blacklisted, an official designation with diplomatic consequences. 2. The UN asked to investigate. Hamas agreed, Israel refused. 3. Israel instead

As a journalist this is the most disturbing storyline I’ve ever covered. An endless stream of fabrications launched as part of a clear diplomatic and media strategy aimed at justifying a genocide. Done with the complicity of many western outlets that tossed aside any semblance