🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

David Schneiderman Congratulations! I had already adopted another textbook/case book for this Spring semester course. But going forward I may well use this book, along with my own edits of cases.

At noon thirty today: What Next for Indigenous Self-government in Canada's Constitutional Order? A Faculty of Law snap panel | University of Toronto Faculty of Law law.utoronto.ca/events/what-ne…

Presenting a draft chapter from my new book on Weber and investment law at iCourts next Wednesday (24 April). In person in Copenhagen or via Zoom at the link: Investment Arbitration as International Bureaucracy?jura.ku.dk/icourts/calend…

Thanks Ben. You were a fab commentator!

Yochai Benkler Luis Flores Jr Andrew Koppelman Ajay K. Mehrotra Review of David Schneiderman, Investment Law’s Alibis: Colonialism, Imperialism, Debt and Development (Cambridge University Press, 2022) by Kehınde Olaoye escholarship.org/uc/item/379197…

Pleased to announce that my new book "Constitutional Review and International Investment Law: Deference or Defiance?" is available on Oxford Scholarship online and available to order. Hope it is of interest to both comparative constitutional law and investment law folks.

Aileen: with your help, the title finally came together!

Honoured to have been invited to contribute a chapter on a canon for constitutional property rights, taking up Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon, James v. UK, and Port Elizabeth v. Various Occupiers.  What an impressive volume (my contribution aside). Congrats to the editors!

In the UofT’s application for an injunction to remove the encampment, there were many references to the Batty case where the Occupy Toronto encampment was ordered removed. A very poor precedent for reasons explained in my op-Ed from 2011: thestar.com/opinion/free-s…

From the last paragraph:The occupiers were not exemplary neighbours. Instead, occupiers appeared disorderly and upset local residents.Constitutional rights, for Justice Brown, must be exercised in a peaceable way — protesters must give way to dog walkers.That is the Canadian way.

Friends at ICON-S in Madrid. Please join us at this Book Roundtable with stellar commentators PR:15 Room 6.04 'Constitutional Review and International Investment Law: Deference or Defiance?' by David Schneiderman virtual.oxfordabstracts.com/#/event/5102/p…

Honoured to be delivering the Chan Sek Keong public law lecture on Thursday August 29th at NUS Faculty of Law: law.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/upl…

If freedom of expression dead? Looking forward to talking with @richard__moon about his new book. Join us on zoom next Tuesday.

Tonight!

Most recent #CFEblog post by David Schneiderman - What if Charter Values Mattered? cfe.torontomu.ca/blog/2024/10/w…

A comment on the University of Toronto encampment ruling authorizing the removal of students from the centre of campus. I argue that the Justice missed the mark by failing to consider whether the common law of trespass was consistent with Charter values.

A fabulously rewarding research project with Nicolás Perrone as an ideal co-author!

After Trump’s illegal tariffs. Empty California wine shelves in Toronto.

Early twentieth century diagnosis of the War of 1812: “a people whose soil is invaded makes always a very stubborn and brilliant defense”