π’Ÿπ‘’π“‡π‘’π“€ ✨ (@cyberdrk) 's Twitter Profile
π’Ÿπ‘’π“‡π‘’π“€ ✨

@cyberdrk

CTO @reown_ 🀝 onchain UX maxi

ID: 805312904

calendar_today05-09-2012 20:21:51

1,1K Tweet

1,1K Followers

1,1K Following

π’Ÿπ‘’π“‡π‘’π“€ ✨ (@cyberdrk) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In our lab setting Canaries which mimic a wallet connection + some signatures being passed back and forth + clients disconnecting latency has come down 50-65% depending on the region Lesss go

In our lab setting Canaries which mimic a wallet connection + some signatures being passed back and forth + clients disconnecting latency has come down 50-65% depending on the region

Lesss go
π’Ÿπ‘’π“‡π‘’π“€ ✨ (@cyberdrk) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The human Pull Request peer review is now often "can you please update the agent.md such that this mistake will be caught by a non-human engineer next time"

π’Ÿπ‘’π“‡π‘’π“€ ✨ (@cyberdrk) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Claude Code on GitHub for peer review is a bit like transaction simulation/Guardians on a multisig: You have some higher confidence that low hanging fruit was caught but still need one other peer and yourself to review

π’Ÿπ‘’π“‡π‘’π“€ ✨ (@cyberdrk) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Beyond the hardware cost, Ledger will also charge a chunky tx fee for their new multisig service: multisig.ledger.com. I'd still prefer a flat-fee subscription, but monetizing this way IMO beats taking big cuts on swaps, staking, or yield πŸ‘

Beyond the hardware cost, Ledger will also charge a chunky tx fee for their new multisig service: multisig.ledger.com.

I'd still prefer a flat-fee subscription, but monetizing this way IMO beats taking big cuts on swaps, staking, or yield πŸ‘
π’Ÿπ‘’π“‡π‘’π“€ ✨ (@cyberdrk) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Crypto likes to say "Don't trust, verify!" but how do you actually do it when you see binary encoded calldata that you're signing?? The Clear Signing library we're building will make this easy for a lot more users