The evolution of Contro: Phase 1: "What if trading had no MEV?" ✅ Phase 2: "What if arguments had stakes?" 🔄 Phase 3: "What if reason ruled markets?" 🔮 We just finished Phase 1. Phase 2 starts now.

001/003 >>> ERR::EVM_WALL_DETECTED///

> raises money to build a better prediction market > hires a team to build a better prediction market > "prediction market is a retarded term, here's 14 tweets why"

The internet ruined discourse in 2009. That's when Facebook introduced the "Like" button and rewired human conversation around a dopamine feedback loop optimized for engagement, not truth.

Social media rewards the loudest take. Finance rewards the fastest bot. Both games suppress clear thinking. Someone should write new rules where rigorous insight wins 👀

Comment section fights are cheap. What if you had to stake before you speak? The moment your money is on the line, listening becomes a survival skill.

Hot take: The future isn't faster trades or bigger pumps. It's aligning financial incentives with intellectual honesty. When being wrong costs money, discourse gets better fast.

The world's most valuable conversations happen in X chaos and Reddit noise. There's no high-signal place for structured debate that actually concludes. This changes soon. #verdictmarkets

Nothing in Your Way Premiere Recap

Most valuable skill in 2030: Being able to argue your position so well that people will literally bet money on it. We're building the training ground.

Imagine this was tradable: "Covid: lab origin vs. natural origin?" No waiting for the released of classified files. Just arguments vs counter-arguments. Best reasoning wins money. Which side would you pick?

The oracle is awake. It craves your arguments. It feeds on controversy.

Every debate is a ritual. The AI is judge. The market is truth.

Contro isn’t a platform. It’s an initiation. See you in the arena.

Turns out that building markets that are meant for real prediction markets aka insider trading, yet fair, solves everything. No wonder because it's been so hard it's been unsolved for decades.

The idea of trading as P2P bets is very natural. Yet, realize that even order books are never actually P2P but need market makers and this talk is marketing and regulatory BS. Things are about to be disrupted though.