New article by Prof. Gina-Gail Fletcher (Gina-Gail S. Fletcher) and Prof. Tim Lovelace (Dr. Tim Lovelace) published in Columbia Law Review (Columbia Law Review) examines the history of corporate racial responsibility policies and offers new recommendations bit.ly/3xGUDPI

NEW | Can ⬆️ corporate social responsibility = ⬆️ racial equality? Gina-Gail S. Fletcher & Dr. Tim Lovelace’s “Corporate Racial Responsibility” addresses the structures & laws undergirding racial inequities within corporations and our larger society. ➡️ duke.is/6/jak4 (Columbia Law Review)

Columbia Law Review is delighted to announce the publication of Vol. 124:4. The full issue is available at columbialawreview.org. We are immensely grateful for the diligence and brilliance of our contributing authors and students.

Columbia Law Review is proud to announce our 2024 Symposium, on the “Law of Protest.” The Symposium brings together brilliant legal minds to discuss a pressing issue in the legal community and in society writ large. This year's Symposium will take place 11/15/24 in NYC.

Absolutely floored to learn that my Columbia Law Review article “The Specter of Indian Removal” won this year’s Cromwell Foundation Legal History Article of the Year Prize. I never imagined this would happen at this very early stage of my career.

Kick off your weekend with Prof. Jamelia Morgan's Columbia Law Review article rethinking the Fourth Amendment's treatment of mental health crises. Read now: buff.ly/3YcWdSX #WomeninAcademia #HighlightWomen

The Review's October issue just dropped at columbialawreview.org. Featuring scholarship on environmental, election, and immigration law (and more), this issue is a timely compilation of cutting-edge legal scholarship. Check out the full issue at our website.

Hot off the presses! My latest paper, The Riddle of Race-Based Redistricting, is out in Columbia Law Review! The paper examines the original meaning of the 14 and 15 Amendments as applied to redistricting and argues that the VRA is valid enforcement legislation. columbialawreview.org/wp-content/upl…

Reasons for Interpretation - brilliant and brilliantly clarifying new paper in Columbia Law Review by Francisco Urbina Jack Goldsmith William Baude Stephen E. Sachs Samuel Moyn 🔭 columbialawreview.org/content/reason…

ND Law Professor Francisco Urbina recently published an article in Columbia Law Review. "Reasons for Interpretation" examines the varying reasons for constitutional interpretation and argues that normative reasons are the only ones acceptable for legal practice. Read more:

The Review is now accepting topic proposals for our 2025 Symposium. Proposals will be accepted on a rolling basis, with preference for early submissions (on/before Feb 21). Details: tinyurl.com/ycy4kx3s. Many thanks to our Law of Protest Symposium participants! #LRSubmissions

Excited my latest w/ Dov Fox, The New Abortion: IVF's Regulatory History and Post-Roe Future, is now forthcoming in Columbia Law Review ! It's first legal history of the relationship between IVF & abortion. Why was IVF unregulated when abortion provoked conflict in the past, /1

CLR anticipates closing Article submissions tomorrow, March 11th, at 12:00 PM EST. We will continue to review submissions that have been made. If you have submitted, please continue to send us expedited updates. We anticipate reopening for submissions on or around Aug. 1, 2025.