Anonymous [Christian] Monk of Sinai Ar. 434 (8th ─ 10th century)'s uses the Qurʾān as a prooftext for the Hypostatic Union [Sinai, St Catherine’s Monastery, MS Ar. 434, fol. 176v]. Reference: Roggema, Qur’ānic Letter versus Spirit, p. 45-77.

EOs are never beating the allegations

What a dreadful state to be in.

The mind of Habib Girgis is astonishing

It appears that Miaphysites run Paradox Interactive

Blessed among women, I am in trouble. Help me with your tears. Ask on bended knee for my reconciliation, Mother of God. Care for me who am miserable, altar of the exalted. Lend me a hand, for I have fallen, heavenly temple. Glorify your Son, by performing upon me the divine

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 Natural progression of the Spirit from the Son is always to creation according to St. Cyril: You should watch the video I made on this! youtube.com/watch?v=iXEc3O…

Blues Blues Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 I've offered to speak to Wagner on the Angel of the Lord and he declined, I'm too "illiterate" to be taken seriously 😂

Did HH Pope Shenouda of the Coptic Orthodox Church permit divorce? No. In fact, he stood up to the Islamic courts of law to defend the Christian faith against impermissible divorces. He wrote about the only Biblical exception, adultery, in his Commentary on the Ten Commandments.

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 This is an incessant laughable response, if you actually watched my video I explained how naturally progressing forth from the Father and Son into creation is a proof of the Spirits divinity. He progresses as natural energy to work the energies of the Triad thus must be consub.

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 If you understand basic sunday school knowledge you'll know Moses spoke as intermediary for the God who appeared through fire relative to the delivering of the law and Stephen applies the same details: Nice attempt to change the subject.

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 This is an entirely different point with a different set of quotes, the prooftext you appealed to is him denying that the Spirit is a contingent creature because he progresses essentially, I gave Cyril's formal account for why he thinks that way.

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 Theodoret actually mentioned this to Cyril, according to Cyril affirming consub between HS and S was to satisfy the anti-filioque of the Antiochene bishops

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 Plugging your ears is childish, mutability in the Spirit is negated because he substantially progresses from both and therefore must be consubstantial if he works the essential energies of the 3 persons and is sent as their natural energy

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 The Spirit essentially progressing from the Son is the energetic progression from the Son because the energies are essential

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 Cyril says the Spirit exists as natural energy (pic 1) he says the energy is natural (pic 2) he says that the progressing as energy is natural (pic 3)

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 And being sent as an energy is to the creature; thus the manifestation of the Spirit is a substantial progression therefore all that you can cite showing an "essential progression" can be chalked up in the context of his entire corpus as being sent as an energy to creature

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 The passage you cited is him denying that being in the image of the Spirit is hypostatically bearing the Spirit, he shows our spirit is a creature but the Holy Spirit isn't so it cannot be the case He VERBATIM says the energetic/natural progression is to the creation

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 After you read my explanation (which passed my free twitter word count) read the last quote and you will see this is verbatim what Cyril says. The EXACT same argument I just made saying that if the Spirit is a creature the essence is BECAUSE HE IS SENT AS ENERGY

Christian B. Wagner 🔫🐒 proof for my premise "things which have the same energy must have the same nature"