
Cardano_G - DREP
@cardanog1
drep1yfju2f0hy2q0z9x8lahy7v3v4rqm2z8kmv07juercm5zqhqmnunqa
ID: 1374713887132631045
24-03-2021 13:26:03
4,4K Tweet
369 Followers
1,1K Following









Charles Hoskinson As a CC member, if it meets constitutional requirements, then it moves forward. But as a DRep, I can’t justify using treasury funds to cover listing fees for a single project. That should be the responsibility of each project, since the primary beneficiaries are their token

Arctic Alpha Point 1 is nothing burger, all infra is there. Community lacks insights. Exchanges just want very high volume on a coin and charge very high listings fees, T1 exchanges that is to say. Infra for exchanges is there, I know because I work on it every day.

Philippe le Long $matiwinnetou | C₳rdano F₳ns (CRF₳) Angry Crypto Show Sebastien Guillemot is a better person to answer than than me, but I believe StarStream will provide privacy over the data in a utxo, but not the funds or whose paying for the fees of the transaction etc. On the other hand, using StarStream on cardano will provide faster finality

James Ruport Quantum HOSKY 🧫🧠 Charles Hoskinson If this is so beneficial for everyone then they could prove this in their proposal since they have already been listed on Kraken. Pre Kraken listing the price and volume suddenly spiked end of 2024, speculation about tier 1 listing started shortly after and in januari 2025 it




Trevor Terris As a CC member I will vote it constitutional, as a DREP I will absolutely vote no. I think the proposal itself doesn’t provide value to Cardano or any other native assets. The exchanges mentioned support CNTs from a technological perspective. This will be clear with the launch



Cardano_G - Drep Trezor does not yet support the message signing required by the claim portal. We are working on a solution and aim to have it ready within the 60‑day claim window. We’ll keep you posted.