The narrative that polyamory is “solely for straight rich people” is just really not my lived experience. I genuinely do not think I would have survived as a poor polyamorous queer Chinese anarchist without the communal network of friends and lovers I made.

When adults are pressed to answer the question of why the oppression of children is supposedly fine when they realize the oppression of other groups is bad, the best they can ever manage is 'but they're CHILDREN!' as if it's self evident that they deserve to be subjugated.

lesbian who takes E to get more lesbian. lesbian who takes T to get more lesbian.

thats right. lesbianism of the 21st century

if you don’t include trans lesbians in your idea of butchness then you’re lacking the full knowledge of the magnificence of butch identity

aversion to T because 'T is gross' etc is a good example of how anti-transmasculinity is intertwined w/ transmisogyny, in particular racialized transmisogyny, anchored by transmisogynoir. the effects of T tend to more strongly move someone into the

1) 'femininity' is not an abstract platonic object placed upon a 'natural sex'. *feminization* is a *process* that *genders* clothes, behaviours, objects, people, it influences the production of objects, and the male/female distinction is enforced in part by feminization

if one feels more disgust and revulsion at someone with broad shoulders wearing a dress or the juxtaposition of beard shadow and makeup than the nominal disgust and revulsion at a petite and hairless person doing either then this isn't a revulsion at feminization, it's implicitly