Brave (@bravef23) 's Twitter Profile
Brave

@bravef23

DeFi and Privacy | Lawyer |

ID: 1389322345374908416

calendar_today03-05-2021 20:54:20

399 Tweet

57 Takipçi

514 Takip Edilen

Brave (@bravef23) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Also, $3CRV strat into merge? Assuming USDC/USDT will only be supported on POS chain post-merge, but could DAI have some value if POS $ETH has value?

Brave (@bravef23) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Does running off with FTT make much sense? There is virtually zero DEX liquidity for FTT. etherscan.io/token/0x50d1c9… Dexscreener lists three pools with maybe $400-500k liquidity.

Brave (@bravef23) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Hi Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) What information is this based on? The first day filing suggests that SBF was the majority owner of all parts of the FTX business, across ftx.com, ftx.us, ventures and Alameda. See picture:

Hi <a href="/adamscochran/">Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)</a> 

What information is this based on? 

The first day filing suggests that <a href="/SBF_FTX/">SBF</a>  was the majority owner of all parts of the FTX business, across ftx.com, ftx.us, ventures and Alameda.

See picture:
0xngmi (@0xngmi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

btw this should be obvious but all the friend-tech clones (including the original friend tech!) store your key in frontend so it's possible to steal your key or all funds with a frontend update

Brave (@bravef23) 's Twitter Profile Photo

#posttech is what Elon Musk wishes X could be Payments and incentives built in. Users paid (by other users) to engage. Crypto onboarding for dummies (you wouldn’t know you had a wallet unless you knew). @PostTechSoFi #posttech $post wen flippening?

Brave (@bravef23) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Finally found my referral codes on @PostTechSoFi Take a look! Invite your friends! Trade your shares! pt-rxtuz9ys2s, pt-5etiadnhzq, pt-g8ivvmt2kb, pt-lblglbewsb, pt-jtb2edyib1, pt-mc4f7ff0bc, pt-xr2gamscst, pt-ppf3pciidl, pt-drcz0nzigi, pt-ndeteah2jt, pt-w2maughhtg,

Brave (@bravef23) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Sounds like there could be some kind of “zero knowledge” solution here, where they can prove they only target one service provider but don’t have to reveal what it is.