NIS. (@zephyrdwn) 's Twitter Profile
NIS.

@zephyrdwn

Viva 🇵🇸

ID: 1177489982400815104

calendar_today27-09-2019 07:47:51

23,23K Tweet

477 Takipçi

371 Takip Edilen

Mischa ༒ (@bronzedvanille) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Art is inherently political. Not recognizing that disqualifies you from engaging with it in a meaningful way. There’s no such thing as being “neutral” that’s just living in conformity and ignorance

jay (@kendallhosseini) 's Twitter Profile Photo

adaptations should be faithful to the source material. unless i havent read the source material. then its fine to change things. unless i read the source material after seeing the adaptation and like the source material better. then its not fine anymore

kaela thee zeglian 🥀 (@kaekaecurtis) 's Twitter Profile Photo

she’s gorgeous and lovely but i am once again annoyed that they decided against doing a world tour stop in korea, mind you her grandmother is literally son sook and has gone on korean news talking about how proud she is of yerin 😭

Muslim Girl (@muslimgirl) 's Twitter Profile Photo

SPOTTED: Margot Robbie at the Wuthering Heights premiere wearing the Taj Mahal necklace. Once a Mughal heirloom, the necklace’s later circulation through Hollywood underscores how colonial objects are rebranded as luxury.

SPOTTED: Margot Robbie at the Wuthering Heights premiere wearing the Taj Mahal necklace.

Once a Mughal heirloom, the necklace’s later circulation through Hollywood underscores how colonial objects are rebranded as luxury.
yup | (@brvttie) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ugh they did her so dirty. She genuinely loved being a part of the show. She (and Rege) put that show on the map and they fully discarded her smh.

Neha (@nehavermani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

No inscriptions on this pendant say Love is everlasting/forever. They mention Nur Jahan’s name & year 1037 A.H. (1627-28 CE), which corresponds to end of her husband Emperor Jahangir’s reign & life. The pendant would have been suspended in a pearl necklace in its original form.

No inscriptions on this pendant say Love is everlasting/forever. They mention Nur Jahan’s name & year 1037 A.H. (1627-28 CE), which corresponds to end of her husband Emperor Jahangir’s reign & life. The pendant would have been suspended in a pearl necklace in its original form.
aurora 🦢 (@lynchianbush) 's Twitter Profile Photo

that white actor wearing an artifact stolen from india while promoting her whitewashed movie in which another white actor stole a role that was originally written for a person of indian heritage is too many levels of infuriating

Naty 🐝⚔ (@aelin_ow) 's Twitter Profile Photo

O que me deixa com o pé atrás na história da Francesca é a série dizer que ela não ama John, quando no livro ela ama John e também se apaixona por Michael. É sobre uma segunda chance no amor, sem apagar o primeiro, e poder ser feliz de novo. Triste ver que não vão adaptar isso.