In short: Supreme Court says Parliament definitely did not intend to amend definition of "sex/woman/man" to protect trans people in their acquired gender. But ministers explicitly stated on record that this would be the effect when taking the legislation through Parliament 🧵

Here's the minister introducing Gender Recognition Bill in 2003 saying it'd amend equality legislation to protect trans people in acquired gender. But Supreme Court judgment somehow concluded there was no evidence that Parliament wanted to protect trans people in acquired gender

IAEA say "no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme" in Iran & find precisely ZERO grams of weapon grade uranium. Yet yesterday in Parliament several MPs falsely claim IAEA think weaponisation imminent. How can such lies stand unchallenged?

The British left today: "Zohran Mamdani is amazing, we MUST emulate everything about him - his policies, his comms, his focus, his mobilisation..." The British left this time next week: "So maybe we just copy his circus-style typeface and keep everything else the same?"