Armando Nava (@navalawaz) 's Twitter Profile
Armando Nava

@navalawaz

Passionate and Experienced Criminal Defense and DUI Law Firm serving Phoenix, AZ and surrounding areas. President of @AACJ_AZ

ID: 783833212296372224

linkhttp://navalawaz.com/ calendar_today06-10-2016 00:56:15

4,4K Tweet

660 Takipçi

1,1K Takip Edilen

Jordan Zirm (@jordanzirm) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I am always fascinated by people who place the burden of survival on everyday civilians, rather than the armed officers pulling up to their communities unannounced in unmarked vehicles and masks

Ben Burgis (@benburgis) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In a free society you are *absolutely* allowed to follow law enforcement around public streets and document what they're doing.

Billy Binion (@billybinion) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Multiple federal circuits have ruled that simply having a gun is *not* enough to justify deadly force. The Second Amendment doesn't vanish near law enforcement.

Armando Nava (@navalawaz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I was on a committee once where a retired police officer suggested we ought to be training citizens how to interact with the police, and it was amazing to me that people think that way in a free society.

Armando Nava (@navalawaz) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The problem is that all those dudes joined ICE so they could murder Americans with impunity. They never wanted to oppose tyranny. They just wanted to be able to freely murder anyone who opposed them.

Carissa Byrne Hessick (@cbhessick) 's Twitter Profile Photo

“The entire point of the last 50 years has been to create exceptions to constitutional protections. First for drug suspects. Then for terrorism suspects. Now for immigration suspects. Each exception normalizes the next. Eventually, the exceptions swallow the rule.”

Clark Neily (@conlawwarrior) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Here’s a thread for folks who are just now realizing—or suspecting, correctly—that our criminal justice system (into which we can fairly lump law enforcement orgs like ICE and CBP) is fundamentally broken and profoundly pathological. I believe it boils down to three things: /1

Clark Neily (@conlawwarrior) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Consider two alternative realities: one in which armed agents of the state know they may have to justify their behavior to a jury of their fellow citizens one day; and another in which they understand there is no realistic prospect of ever having to do so. Which do you prefer?

Scott Hechinger (@scotthech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Reminder that Justice Kavanaugh’s rewriting of the constitution to allow police to engage in blatant racial profiling was based in part on his “belief” that police would exercise restraint. I don’t think he really believed that.