The pandemic of misinformation is primarily due to one thing: consumption of Information in parts. A deposition is a question and answer session, and to get the full context, you must give it a community reading. You must read it entirely. The issue however is, the herders of

Line 3 to 5 on this image is enough to destroy the imagination of forgery in this case. The school doesn't keep record of when former students apply for diploma and picked it up. They will never have a record of Tinubu requesting for a replacement diploma in the 90s.

The official CSU deposition transcript is available here: tinyurl.com/CSUdeptranscri… Please retweet broadly so everyone can get to read it themselves and draw their own conclusions.

God is truly patient and long-suffering. I now fully understand the extent of His patience and long-suffering nature. He’s seeing all these blatant fabrications and truth twists and He is still gracious enough to give these folks a long rope. God, na you, biko. Indeed you’re God.

I don’t even know where this third party vendor issue became relevant for Tinubu’s certificate. The CSU registrar never said that they used a third party vendor back in 1998/99 when Tinubu’s INEC-submitted diploma would have been issued. All he said was that diplomas are

Hopefully, the so-called female Bola Tinubu will get to hear about Atiku’s world press conference and finally come out of her shell. Or if she’s no longer alive, that members of her nuclear or extended family will come forward with proof.

Some people will rather allege forgery without pointing to where forgery was established in the deposition. Show us where and don’t just post the relevant transcript pages you’re basing your claims on, also post the pages before and after them for full context and post the full

At this point, I think it is a total dereliction of duty on the part of TV stations to allow people to speak on the certificate forgery issue without referring to and reading out in full context the deposition transcript pages that support their position, whichever side that may

While this is helpful, what would be more helpful is for you to state whether the deposition transcript makes out a case of forgery or not. Surely, you can’t be saying that there is ambiguity in the transcript, and, if that is what your view is, come out and say so. If the

Although he did not say so, some continue to say that the CSU registrar said that the certificate that PBAT submitted to INEC (the "INEC diploma") did not emanate from CSU. What he actually said was that the INEC diploma was not issued by CSU in 1979 (i.e., it could only be a

Bola Tinubu diploma: No evidence Nigeria's president forged college record bbc.in/46GBBoY

Just wondering how Atiku’s lawyers are feeling now.

thecable.ng/the-menace-of-…

Fascinating "I admire Dr. Schmidt's dedication to science, but I think we can all agree that being stung 78 times for research is one 'sting' operation we'd all like to avoid. 🙅‍♂️ #ResearchGoneWild"

The ruling of the SC in the Presidential Election on witness statements doesn’t sit well with me. That jurisprudence is too restrictive, in my view, notwithstanding that election petitions are in a class of their own. If nothing is done legislatively (including via constitutional

I didn’t hear anything about the forfeiture matter in the SC’s judgment. That issue was raised only in Peter Obi’s appeal. While I agree with the Court of Appeal’s reasoning on that, the SC must still cover that. I assume it is going to be in their written judgment and that it

He said: "We won and we'll prove it in court." Note: even the 1st runner up never said that - I listened intently to the press conference the 1st runner up had after the elections. But what he really meant was: "Our gut feeling from our hearts of hearts is that we won, and we