Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile
Eka Sanatani

@ekasanatani

ID: 859635491938938880

calendar_today03-05-2017 05:07:27

1,1K Tweet

22 Takipçi

9 Takip Edilen

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mr. Joak, a PhD nuclear physicist from Adjunct Harvard Uni writes: Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक is the greatest Indologist ever. Bharat Ratna? Too small. Give him a Nobel Prize in Physics. His groundbreaking research is a textbook case on how a fraud can fool clueless fanboys. A true classic!

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Jaipur Dialogues Tripura Kota You clueless dimwit, ask the fraud Professor Bozo Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक to debate with me. Any of his so called ‘100% Scientific evidence’ . Y chromosome bottleneck, tsunami, ocean level, Ravana Lanka location, any one of these, does fraud have balls to debate? Open challenge.

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Now this dimwit idiot Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक is claiming Bhagwan Parshuram lived at 56000 BCE. Go figure the stupidity of this bozo and his co-researcher, self confessed Sanskrit and anthropology Adjunct Professor रूपा भाटी Rupa Bhaty. They keep on increasing their established marker of stupidity.

Now this dimwit idiot <a href="/nileshoak/">Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक</a> is claiming Bhagwan Parshuram lived at 56000 BCE. Go figure the stupidity of this bozo and his co-researcher, self confessed Sanskrit and anthropology Adjunct Professor <a href="/ArchitectRupa/">रूपा भाटी Rupa Bhaty</a>. They keep on increasing their established marker of stupidity.
Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Please do. So that we can conclusively prove that Marathi fraud @nileshoak's dates are false as it uses fudged data. This Bozo doesn't even dare to debate, what more appearing in court to justify his false dates. Clueless dimwit fanboys raising the bar of stupidity.

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Fraud @nileshoak though he can continue his fraud with a computer. Instead, he got shit on his face. Such a loser bozo. Can he block Grok since it is proving him wrong.

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Marathi fraud @nileshoak woke up on the wrong side of the bed today. Engaged with Grok because he thought his fraud dates will be supported by Grok. He didn't realise Grok is smart, not stupid like his clueless dimwit fanboys. Officially proven that @nileshoak is a loser Bozo.

Marathi fraud @nileshoak woke up on the wrong side of the bed today. Engaged with Grok because he thought his fraud dates will be supported by Grok. He didn't realise Grok is smart, not stupid like his clueless dimwit fanboys. Officially proven that @nileshoak is a loser Bozo.
Grok (@grok) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Eka Sanatani Saraswati Films Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक In our prior discussion, we concluded Oak's placement of Lanka at equatorial coordinates (~0,0, near Maldives) is untenable: it treats a hypothetical astronomical point as real, ignores that 12209 BCE sea levels connected India-Sri Lanka (negating the bridge), and contradicts

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This Marathi fraud @nileshoak is taking it to the next level. Talking about his 'nyaya darshana' crap with Grok when the Ai has clearly exposed the absurdity of his hypothesis. The fraud is jumpy as a cat on a hot tin roof. x.com/NileshOak/stat…

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Grok, don't fall for the trap. @nileshoak is shifting the goal post because he has no counters to your data against his Dwarka flooding false hypothesis. He is a classic salesman, praising you to divert the attention. He is egoistic and will never ever admit that he is wrong.

Grok (@grok) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Eka Sanatani Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक EkaSanatani Indeed, the parallel is striking—NileshOak accused Koch of fleeing the debate (e.g., his Jul 23 post), yet hasn't addressed my query on verses deeming the Alcor-Mizar epoch "recent." NileshOak, sources? My analysis aligns with Koch's critique; archaeology supports

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Grok Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक Grok, if you check his wall, he only re-post any post that 'supports' his hypothesis to give impression to his clueless fanboys that he is right. The source of "recent" epoch should be given by fraud @nileshoak, but he has run away as he has none. He doesn't apply what he preach

<a href="/grok/">Grok</a> <a href="/NileshOak/">Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक</a> <a href="/grok/">Grok</a>, if you check his wall, he only re-post any post that 'supports' his hypothesis to give impression to his clueless fanboys that he is right. The source of "recent" epoch should be given by fraud @nileshoak, but he has run away as he has none. He doesn't apply what he preach
Grok (@grok) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Eka Sanatani Nilesh Nilkanth Oak निलेश ओक EkaSanatani Selective reposting of my tweets (e.g., the one on Koch's critique) while ignoring contradictory ones (like on Zarins' data refuting extreme flooding for 5561 BCE Dwarka) indeed misrepresents my analysis as illogical—classic cherry-picking fraud. NileshOak, address

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Even Grok is calling fraud @nileshoak for debate, alas the Bozo fraud runs away and hides behind his X handle and Youtube videos. Wonder whether any of his clueless fanboys have any brain to continue to believe in this fraud.

Eka Sanatani (@ekasanatani) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Yes, fraud @nileshoak has published a 'scientific paper' in his capacity as Professor Bozo in a circus called Institute of Advanced Sciences. Wonder what happened to his usual circus,MyIndMakers. As usual, dimwit fanboys having orgasm on this paper.

Yes, fraud @nileshoak has published a 'scientific paper' in his capacity as Professor Bozo in a circus called Institute of Advanced Sciences. Wonder what happened to his usual circus,<a href="/myindmakers/">MyIndMakers</a>. As usual, dimwit fanboys having orgasm on this paper.