🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

In today's Private Eye Magazine, I argue that the conclusions of experts in the Letby case are so ludicrously opposed that they can't all be right, and they can't all be competent. It's GMC 's duty to protect us from incompetent doctors, and it's time they started investigating.

Winter fool shock The new Private Eye is out now

Do your research. Four of the defence experts that I know of are UK registered doctors (3 neonatologists and a pathologist). One instructed UK registered expert who has seen all the evidence has made this public statement; "Having reviewed all relevant documentation in detail,

I agree. The issue here is that some of the prosecution experts argued that the only possible explanation for the collapses and deaths was deliberate harm, purely by a process of deduction without any substantive forensic evidence to support it. All the other experts I have

"If the convictions are later overturned, Thirlwall may end up criticising the wrong people, or criticising the right people for the wrong reasons." Dr Phil Hammond 💙's latest column on the Lucy Letby case is out today, with a snippet below:

EUROPEAN WINNERS!!! 🏆

Is Lucy Letby innocent? SUNDAY on #60Mins, the extraordinary claims neonatal nurse Lucy Letby was wrongfully convicted.

Svilena Some reflections: The sense of unease that comes with the Lucy Letby case could probably be summed up in a sentence: how is it possible for one of the hardest-working nurses in a department to wind up with multiple whole-of-life convictions in the complete absence of direct

The moment Lucy Letby’s legal team chose to go public with their expert concerns that the prosecution experts and the Chester neonatologists had made serious errors, this case became all about competence. The defence experts were staggered that the prosecution experts failed to

The vast majority of letters in Private Eye Magazine are to point out errors. I think we’ve had two criticisms of the coverage in the year I’ve been writing about this (22 columns) - one from a retired dermatologist and the other from a retired GP. There have been no criticisms from

I was recently asked a very important question: why have I not referred other doctors, about whom I have serious concerns having reviewed their clinical input and witness statements, to the General Medical Council (GMC)? The reason is this - the fact as it stands is that GMC has

"In each and every one of these cases, there was a very, very plausible alternative explanation." Professor Neena Modi on 60 Minutes Australia tonight, discussing Lucy Letby's convictions for murdering and attempting to murder babies. 9now.nine.com.au/60-minutes/luc…

In his 60 Minutes Australia interview, Dr Dewi Evans dismisses the findings of Dr Shoo Lee's expert panel as "about as weak a group of opinions that I've ever seen." At Letby's first trial, Evans was singing a different tune about Lee's credentials & research, referring to his 1989 paper on

Just four days before Keir Starmer joined France's Emmanuel Macron and Canada's Mark Carney in calling on Benjamin Netanyahu to end the horror or face – limited – consequences, UK government lawyers were making closing arguments against a high court challenge to a loophole which

"Statistics and the law: Why statistical literacy matters in the justice system" "One high-profile example that brought this issue into the spotlight recently, is the case of Lucy Letby, the convicted neonatal nurse." barcouncil.org.uk/resource/stati…