Old history texts, unique, and antiquated. Tgus one from 1898. Makes one wonder how future generations will judge us and our writing.

While simultaneously moving and cataloging my book collection, I found this gem in the 1969 Furnas text . . . you just never know what you'll find when you open the pages of a real book! And still a good question ... "are we civilized"?

Male office humor from the 1960s? Not funny. Just leaves me shaking my head. Found inside a WWII book published in 1969.

In the #metoo era, sexual assault policies are rooted in 19th-century laws and customs. @Devilnrae2 draws a compelling link between past and present, pointing to unexpected local #archives for important legal history research. clioandthecontemporary.com/2024/06/26/sex…

I have decided that, as a woman, the first half of your life is learning how to multitask. The second part of your life is about learning how to focus on one thing at a time.

I have not the frame of mind to reread Rousseau this morning, though I must. I might just puke up my doughnuts...I'm sure that would have charmed the pants right off him.

Rousseau about sex, 1762: "The Most High has . . . endowed man with boundless passions, together with a law to guide them, so that man may be alike free and self-controlled; though swayed by these passions man is endowed with reason by which to control them." #rape

CFP: A Research Handbook on Gender, History, and Law dlvr.it/TCVyrl

My students are exploring the experiences of Chinese immigrants in the West after the Exclusion Act in my Gilded Age class today ... so fun to highlight Katrina Jagodinsky and her amazing Petitioning for Freedom Project! Neb. History Dept. DigitalLegalResearchLab #habeascorpus

I had the honor of working with Jessica and NCHE this week & loved meeting fellow Kansas teachers! Thanks for your hard work everyday to integrate our collective histories into your classrooms and thank you to National Council for History Education for your dedication to truth. ❤️

"It is time for society to look at this macho, patriarchal society and change the way it looks at rape," she told the court. She said she would never forgive her husband.'" reuters.com/world/europe/g…

No, the president is NEVER above the law. If there is doubt about that, the United States of America already ceases to exist.

No ethics pledge. Imagine if Harris had refused.

Important perspective here. Mexico suggests it could retaliate with tariffs after Trump threat: "There is no subordination here" cbsnews.com/news/mexico-re… via CBS News

So many assignment formats are now unavailable options because of AI. I have tried to keep discussion boards going. But, alas, RIP. No more.

This hell site is making us all stupid. Trump doesn't have the ability to revoke the EEO (1972) or title VII of the civil rights act (1964). He rolled back Executive Order 11246 of 1965 which while shitty, only applies to federal contractors.

Civil Rights Act of 1964 is codified law and cannot be undone with an executive order.

Birthright citizenship cannot be undone by an executive order. Read the Constitution folks.