New position at SFU Psychology in behavio(u)ral neuroscience. Come join us and be part of the growing community focused on understanding and promoting brain health. SFU Institute for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology sfu.ca/vpacademic/aca…

Glad to be part of this big project led by Cristiano Costa and Cristina Scarpazza. In a meta-analysis of fMRI data we investigated the potential presence of domain-general hubs for predictive processing onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hb…

Access to the article "One hundred years of EEG for brain and behavior research" published in Nature Human Behaviour. EEGMany labs and the GBC spearhead this joint effort of more than 500 EEgers. Kudos to Faisal Mushtaq for guiding this. rdcu.be/dRFz5

We are excited to announce the first hackathon on the EBRAINS Software Distribution! The event, which runs from 27-29 November in Heidelberg, is a unique opportunity to collaborate on extending and improving the EBRAINS Software Distribution. Learn more: ebrains.eu/news-and-event…

This seems particularly relevant for long, "precision" scans, like the Midnight Scan Club. Nico Dosenbach is the new homunculus robust to this correction?

do we want to know which variables are direct causes of a target outcome, or the full dependencies among all variables? gradually i started to think that it's probably neither, since the utility of each cause is not a function of the distance to the target outcome variable but

So Ben Inglis aka practicalfMRI interviewed me for his Coffee Break! series of chats on fMRI and its pains. My imposter syndrome was particularly strong this time, but it turned out to be specially fun and instructive for me. Listen to/read Ben's stuff! youtu.be/JFVD9agFAcQ?si…

-calls correlation FC -sells FC as biological property -is surprised that FC is equivalent to a correlation -uses this discovery as validation of FC as statistical object Genius

My department is conducting a new faculty search in computational neuroscience, broadly defined. Please help spread the word!

It's such a pleasure to be at the #CCS2024 #CompSocSci satellite & present joint work with my amazing collaborators Zoltan Kmetty Ádám Stefkovics Júlia Számely Julia Koltai yijing Gerardo Iñiguez gale! Here are the links to the papers, in case you'd like to know more (🧵)...

Nice meta analysis and figures. Still it promotes the fallacy of assigning to the system under study (brain) a property of the mathematical model used to fit the data (criticality). The universality of these models could itself solve the controversy mentioned there.

Our tireless reporter Hiroki Sayama presenting now! Gladly surprised to see some connections to my upcoming talk. #CCS2024 Conference on Complex Systems

Very interesting points raised here. There's the need to clarify and align objectives, methods, nomenclature. If the goal is fingerprinting, why not using standard measures? If it's another one, why call it fingerprinting? Is "differentiability" a different objective?

After 15 years of life on campus I am finally stepping out into the real world! As a goodbye gift, I am leaving you with a meme to summarize my decade-long journey through network science

Absolutely fabulous resource about complexity science thinking applied to psychology, written by the great Han van der Mass! 👇🏽👇🏽 (Free online version, look for it in the link)

Congrats to the organizers for a fantastic Conference on Complex Systems edition!

Alvaro Corral 🌎🌍🌏 Redes y Sistemas Complejos en Español Nassim Nicholas Taleb If only nature worked like Per Bak wished, I would agree. But it is a beautiful fact that it doesn't: petterhol.me/2021/09/14/uni… (and the title is presumptuous, but nothing like the content . . 😆 )

This explains very well an aspect of a reversal fallacy that I often encounter (sometimes in my own work) and that I have often a hard time explaining, e.g. x.com/dan_marinazzo/…

Join us in Maastricht for a great NetSci!