A 14 day offline course on Calculus as Ganita (calculus without limits and w/o real numbers), in NIE, Mysore, see poster (pic1) and brochure (pics2,3). Scan qr codes for course contents. Next iteration in Aug is for IIT students only, not open to general public.

Typo: Mysore course starts on 14 July but is of 12 day-duration. These 40+ hours will be covered in the usual 3-lectures per week schedule in IIT.

The Mysore course is open also to independent researchers. But u need to have taken a first course on (Western) calculus (as purva paksha) to be able compare the two and decide which is BETTER. This is also the prerequisite in IIT.

Einstein's ORIGINAL 1905 paper on special relativity (pic1) involved electrodynamics BUT he NEVER did the 2-body problem, in all his life, since he failed to understand FDEs. That is, “Einstein’s mistake” means NOT that the theory of relativity is wrong, but that Einstein was a

Sure, you are welcome! Pls fill in the form.

Einstein’s original paper on special relativity was called “On the electrodynamics of moving bodies”, but, STRANGELY, Einstein NEVER did the (classical) electrodynamics of TWO-bodies (say, electron and proton)!🤣Why not, if relativity was his own theory? Einstein the cheat who

Of course, u can participate! For references scan QR codes. Explicitly below. Background reading? The course is designed for IITians from 2nd year on. So it is assumed that u are familiar with the "Thomas calculus" (any book, pic1) they study in 1st year. Brush it up. Key

Einstein never solved the 2-body (e.g. electron-proton) problem of classical electrodynamics—and was too weak in math even to understand Poincare’s remark that it needed a different math. Poincare died before he could get any solution to this problem, very difficult those days.

But look at the racism which reared it head when I raised this issue of the 2-body problem in the 1999 Groningen debate. (I was invited after reviews of my book circulated and I got to be known in scientific circles also for my work on time.) Of course, this international

Here is what Zeh said (pic1,2,3,4). i.e., he said, "I don't accept what u say, but don't know what else to do!"🤣 What this racist duffer failed to grasp is that the e.m. fields specified at one "instant" of time must be specified across ALL space. How to do that ?

How to prescribe e.m. fields for all space at one instant of time? For that we MUST know the ENTIRE past history of the two particles (in the retarded case) (pic1). So, past history IS needed. There IS a paradigm shift from Newtonian mechanics (just due to electrodynamics).

It wasn’t just one racist, Zeh (who restricted his racist remarks to private conversation with me over lunch). NO ONE solved the classical electrodynamic 2-body problem for over a century, until I did. Why mot? Because they didn’t understand the necessary math: namely COUPLED

Racists are NOT the only people who use the equation: “valid science = science which has Western social approval” It is a political trick to make the colonised mentally servile to Western social authority as they so manifestly ARE. E.g. take Narlikar’s junk version of the

It is not just Narlikar and the Congress, the BJP + many supporters are equally committed to the belief that "validity of math and science MUST be decided ONLY through Western social approval". Hence, the current govt has appointed Manjul Bhargava to decide the math syllabus

I have already written textbooks such as Rajju Ganita which reject the use of invisible points. These have been tried out YEARS ago. (pic1,2) For a shadow PM you are remarkably clueless that education is tightly state controlled. Who is going to say my texts are "better"? You?

Einstein COULD not have created special relativity, he was too ignorant. But how do you know Einstein created general relativity? From stories and the press obviously!😀 The Jewish owner of New York Times, Adolph Ochs promoted fellow Jew Einstein by running a free publicity

Yes, it puzzled many. The gullible Hilbert was even willing to share credit, but the greedy Einstein wanted all of it. The Nobel-laureate Eugene Wigner, who was Hilbert's post-doc, was among the many ppl who found it hard to understand (pic) how Hilbert was dealt out of credit

Well my retarded gravitation theory of 2012 (see expository article, pic1) certainly is a history-dependent theory of gravitation (uses retarded FDEs). It's advantage? The many-body problem can be done; it has not been done on general relativity, but It is needed because

To celebrate (🤣) Einstein's plagiarism of special relativity, Michael Atiyah, in his 2005 Einstein Centenary lecture, PLAGIRSED my idea, viz. that a proper solution of the 2-body problem (electron-proton) of classical electrodynamics might help explain various puzzling features