We will be debunking this until the end of the internet.

"or otherwise objectionable" is the most narrow interpretation of section 230, ya turkey

Whenever Section 230 is trending, I know it’s because someone doesn’t understand how it works. Checks out every time.

Braindead take. Section 230 is the only reason free speech exists on the Internet. Otherwise lawyers would be threatening lawsuits right and left to (successfully) get controversial content removed.

For too long big tech has enjoyed First Amendment rights. We must repeal the First Amendment for these private companies. /s

Do you want Congress and Biden to reform Section 230? No No No 👇 👇 👇

Dafuq is he talking about. Seriously someone help me

WHATS THE CAUSE OF ACTION, JAKE

Love the quotations on "edit" as if that means something 😹

Sorry we have been a little inactive since the end of last year. We promise to resume covering bad #Section230 takes as politicians and prominent figures decide to say something. Don't hesitate to tag us.

Those companies are private, and the #FirstAmendment is a restraint on government, not on private actors. Your speech, along with millions of others online, is empowered and available on platforms because of #Section230. h/t Sparkypants 🇺🇸 Doom Prophet for the tag. Please do more folks!

1A also notably includes freedom of association. It's also a restraint on government, not private companies. Twitter being privately owned versus a publicly traded firm has no implication here whatsoever. Thanks Devin Nunes’ cow 🐮 for the tag. Keep it up folks!

Gonzalez v Google args start today. Be sure to tune in - this has significant impacts on speech and content on the internet. Be sure to check out #Section230 to see all the takes coming in. Lord knows I am sure we will have some bad ones coming out of it.

Missed the oral arguments for #GonzalezvGoogle today? Check out Eric Goldman (he/him)'s latest blog post giving a quick debrief on what went down today: blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2023/… #Section230

It is worth noting that a terrible bill, the #EARNIT Act, will be getting a markup this week in the Senate Judiciary Committee. It would amend #Section230, undermine #encryption and threaten the #privacy of countless Americans.

SMH people these days. No, Twitter will not financially pay, nor should they, and thank god for that. Such a case would get tossed very quickly, and rightly so. #Section230 empowers speech online for Anne as much as it does for Tucker as much it does for ordinary people.

It truly never gets old. That is not how #Section230 works, folks! If you see bad takes out there, don't forget to tag us. We do see it, promise!